On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 12:07 -0500, DAve wrote:
> Thomas Lindell wrote:
> > At&t mail servers use his service.
> >
> > Which means I can't send to mediacom which is an at&t partner
> >
> > I couldn't believe at&t used his service.
> >
> > What's odd is that my company uses at&t backhaul bandwi
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:02 -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2006 at 14:17, Craig White wrote:
>
>
>
> > http://www.mailscanner.info/linux.html
> >
> > This is the information page for installing MailScanner on RPM based
> > Linux system.
> >
Cabell
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Craig White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:00 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help for beginner
>
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > FWIW, Dale&#x
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> FWIW, Dale's been mailing me privately where I've been answering, but just for
> everyone's info:
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:04:18AM -0700, Cabell, Dale wrote:
> > Where do I put the tar? After I untar it, where do I execute the
> > r
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 19:34 -0700, jdow wrote:
> If I was feeling stinky I'd note that I do not like web administration
> tools as much as I like editing the files myself by hand doing things
> I understand from an overdose of RTFM. And I'm not a Linux guy last
> time I checked myself in front of a
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:29 +0100, nick wrote:
> Michael W Cocke wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:04:11 -, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Works fine with postfix...
> >>
> >>http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:pos
> >>tfix:politics&s=politics
> >
> >
> >
> > Th
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 09:57 -0500, Michael W Cocke wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:10:26 -, you wrote:
>
> >Shane
> >
> >Have a look at MailScanner as an alternative to amavisd - it's nice to have
> >a choice isn't it..
>
> My understanding is that mailscanner doesn't work safely with postfix.
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 23:23 +, Craig McLean wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> [snip sendmail discussion]
>
> > I've about come to that conclusion myself, so I'm now investigating the
> > fetchmail->procmail_>dovecot solution right now. But th
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 22:36 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Craig White a écrit :
> >
> > oops...meant to send to list...
> >
> > and by all means...
> >
> > setup dovecot for maildir
> >
> > use IMAP not POP3 for you local email. IMAP frees you fro
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 03:27 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Gene Heskett a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Except pipe it through spamc, although I'd assume a shell pipe might be
> > able to do that, just haven't given it any great amount of thought yet.
>
> it's better to run an MTA, so that fetchmail gets back to
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 01:10 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I just stumbled over an announcement on freshmeat about getmail as a
> substitute for fetchmail, but from looking at the web page & FAQ, its
> not clear if getmail can both filter by passing the incoming mail thru
> SA,
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:48 -0800, Steve Maller wrote:
> OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0
> on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a
> bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled.
>
> Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:16 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fetchmail is verbatim in the sense needed. Does fetchmail go through
> the tool that fires off SpamAssassin or is this done up in KMail as
> it reads? If so KMail may have sanitized off headers in much the
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:57 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> >to my knowledge, fetchmail doesn't remove any headers at all.
> > Procmail may be doing it or your MTA, depending upon how you are
> > handling it.
> >
> Humm, AFAIK, fetchmail gets it from vz, writing it
> to /var/spool/mail/gene
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
> >> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
> >>
> >> ATM, I have a "grep -R HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 *" running from /
> >> because that rule isn't pres
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 04:04 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
> > Mouss wrote on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:56:22 +0100:
> >
> >
> >>"localhost" is an fqdn with no dots
> >
> >
> > No FQDN.
> >
>
> Prove it.
This is a bit argumentative and I don't wish to feed this but...
http://en.
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 05:37 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Jdow wrote on Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:22:40 -0800:
> >
> >> curmudgeon
> >
> > I learned a new word :-)
> >
> > My stance on this is that the list-admin should please immediately
> > unsubscribe everyon
# spamassassin -D --lint
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4
*** snip ***
debug: bayes: 11143 tie-ing to DB file
R/O /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_toks
debug: bayes: 11143 tie-ing to DB file
R/O /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes_seen
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 3
*** snip ***
I can't figure out h
CentOS 3.4
# rpm -qa spamassassin
spamassassin-3.0.3-1.1.el3.rf
# rpm -qa mailscanner
mailscanner-4.41.3-1
I start with starter db from Fortress Systems since my old bayes db from
2.6x was creamed by this same issue...
# spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -D --lint
much sn
19 matches
Mail list logo
