Re: Botnet over aggressive?

ages at 5.1 from two British Telcos, Orange and Magrathea. Both companies have mis-configured reverse DNS. Regards, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (Office) Suite 67, Dorset House +44 7973 616 666 (Mobile) Duke Street, Chelmsfo

Re: Botnet over aggressive?

or the time being. But is this the right way to do it or should I be creating another file somewhere? Regards, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (Office) Suite 67, Dorset House +44 7973 616 666 (Mobile) Duke Street, Chelmsford, C

Botnet over aggressive?

no reverse DNS, BOTNET_NORDNS scores it as 0.01 but BOTNET adds 5.0 to that. In addition, RDNS_NONE is adding 0.1 so every mail that lacks reverse dns is getting a minimum of 5.1. Is this intended behaviour? Regards, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (O

spamc -x -R

I'm wondering if this is a bug or by design for some reason. Thanks, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (Office) Suite 67, Dorset House +44 7973 616 666 (Mobile) Duke Street, Chelmsford, CM1 1TB -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---

Re: Spamhaus Tests

ues there? Oh and thank you for your most helpful response. Regards, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (Office) Suite 67, Dorset House +44 7973 616 666 (Mobile) Duke Street, Chelmsford, CM1 1TB -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ve

Re: Spamhaus Tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler wrote: > However, be aware that I'm merely a "helpful community member" and my > opinions on the list uses are purely non-official. Thank you, that was all very helpful. Cliff. - -- Cliff S

Spamhaus Tests

to put the secondary MXs' IP addresses into "internal_networks" instead. 4. Lists Is this the right place or should I have posted this to the dev list instead? Many thanks, Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited +44 845 0045 666 (Office) Suite 67, Dor