Or, easier and faster, use the milter-regex (if you are using sendmail as
you MTA). You can then build a regex to drop beyond a certain level.
Or, if you're feeling braver, you can use the patches at the following page
to set discard ranges directly on the spamass-milter:
http://www.jmaimon.com/s
Christopher Martin wrote:
Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able
to present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
portion of that is spam, and how many are being caught
Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able to
present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
portion of that is spam, and how many are being caught/quarantined every
day, etc.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2006 5:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: I'm thinking about suing Microsoft
>
>
> Holding the position of "most widely-attacked" is no reason
> for it to also be "least
>
Hi,
Spam assassin has for a long time been picking up e-mails with content
like the following (I have changed a few letters to prevent Bayesian
stuff from picking it up), but it's always based on URIs, HTML structure
and such, rather than on a plain text match on the body.
V LOST P
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I would like to know howto automatically remove detected Spam? I don't
want spamassassin to deliver the spam with a [SPAM] tag at the begining of
the message but preffer to send it (the spam) directly to something like
/dev/null
Why don't you use amavisd-new ( ht
If you are using dhclient, you should try:
man dhclient
man dhclient.conf
This will depend on what flavour of Linux you're on, different ones might
not use the ISC client.
Here is a config example which shows how to run a script:
timeout 60;
retry 60;
reboot 10;
Only peripherally related to SA, but I figure someone here is bound to
know the answer: do any of Razor, Pyzor, DCC or any of the other peer
spam rating systems cache queries? That being, if we get the same spam
sent to a thousand staff as individual mails, how many lookups do I get,
3 (one for
The regex would be:
[a-zA-Z]\s[a-zA-Z]\s[a-zA-z]\s
So, (IIRC) the rule could be:
body LOCAL_GAPPY_WORDS/[a-zA-Z]\s[a-zA-Z]\s[a-zA-z]\s/
score LOCAL_GAPPY_WORDS2
Try it with a low score to start with. I use the LOCAL_ prefix for any rules
I put into local.cf.
But, I a
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2006 9:48 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Any comments of the SpamHaus lawsuit?
> >
> Don't put down to politics what can be more easily explained
> by generic
> human lazine
On a side note, I just spent some time reading the supporting documentation
that E360 has posted on their site, and (I don't know if someone has already
pointed this out, so I am hoping I am not repeating someone else's post)
there are some really big holes in their logic for calculating how much
r
True, it did begin as American only, back in the DARPA days, but I had
always been told the story in the order of DNS being much later than the
DARPA days and that it was starting to spread overseas by that stage. If I
have it wrong I will take that on board and revise my opinions.
I was also tryi
Really, the idea that a US courts can order an international organisation,
like InterNIC (that's the Inter- bit of InterNIC), to deregister a domain is
farcical. The only pressure the US courts can place on InterNIC is "Do what
we say or you get shut down". Well, go ahead. Somehow I think that the
The English language is a complex and varied piece of work, and
sometimes the unforeseen can happen!
For example, if you have gotten tired of having to clear out the most
common spams from your quarantine folder you may consider using
milter-regex in addition to Spam Assassin and your Virus ap
I have been noticing the occasional spam slipping past spam assassin
unscathed lately but have been a bit busy to pay attention (one spam a
day is much better than the 150 each user used to get). I paid a bit
more attention to one the other day and noticed it had an X-Spam header
before it got
I have a dual P3 server I am hoping to run as our main spam filtering
machine. I am satisfied the spam is being caught, I am just worried whether
it can deal with the load as the machine idles with one CPU fully utilised.
Here are some system details:
antispam02# uname -a
FreeBSD antispam02.ebit.
16 matches
Mail list logo
