age a few plugins of my own for installation on other systems
and hence you mangle the spamassassin package itself?
oh my lord..
[root@mail-gw:~]$ rpm -qa | grep spamassassin | sort
spamassassin-3.4.4-1.fc31.x86_64
spamassassin-bogofilter-1.0-8.fc31.20200204.rh.noarch
spamassassin-clamav-
smart people would have opened koji, enter spamasssin,, select the F31
package from
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=554 and
downloaded
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/spamassassin/3.4.4/1.fc31/x86_64/spamassassin-3.4.4-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
or just used "dnf
On 2/4/2020 5:12 PM, Chris Conn wrote:
On 2/4/2020 5:09 PM, Damian wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 maybe?
Hello,
You were correct; using 3.4.3 on fedora with milter-spamc, pretty much
every email would match DKIM_INVALID when handled by the MTA and
On 2/4/2020 5:09 PM, Damian wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 maybe?
Hello,
HM, very possible. I am using milter-spamc but the behaviour might be
similar. I will look to build 3.4.4 and see if I get better DKIM
returns. Thanks for this.
Chris
I am runni
Hello,
I am running SA3.4.3 and I noticed that I am scoring DKIM_INVALID on
pretty much each and every email handled by the MTA. However, if I take
the raw .eml and pipe it through spamassassin -t -D, I receive a
DKIM_VALID score.
Any tips on how I could go about to troubleshoot why the MTA
On 1/9/2020 10:10 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jan 9, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
Hi everyone, someone from the list who can share the rpm of the
latest version of spamassassin for centos 7 and 6 of x64, I want to
update to the latest version and I can't find the rpm.
SA 3.4.2 is
On 7/3/2019 5:43 AM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
The plugin works with our Data Query Service (DQS). The DQS provides
you with additional feeds: Zero Reputation Domain & AuthBL, and it
also receives updates in 'realtime.' This last point is key, because,
as you can see in the latest Virus Bulle
Yeah, because 3.4.x implements maxhits.
So, should I disable the __GENERATE_LEADS family for < 3.4.0? I
suspect it would be prudent, but I am surprised the other
tflags=multiple rules aren't also problematic in the same manner...
Hello,
I don`t think I am in a position to comment on whe
WTF? If tflags=multiple is supported at all, it should behave properly
(i.e. not hitting over and over on the *same bit of text*).
maxhits was implemented after 3.3.1; is it possible that there are
just a *lot* of instances of "your business" in that test message, and
it's simply hitting all
On 4/18/2018 10:32 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Chris Conn skrev den 2018-04-18 16:00:
this is a relatively old install, SA 3.3.1 on Centos6 (stock RPMs)
maybe solved in centos7 ?
i do not use precompiled problems
Hello,
I believe I found the issue. On my Centos6 boxes with SA 3.3.1 (the
maybe solved in centos7 ?
i do not use precompiled problems
Hello,
I guess I will soon find out. Not using bayes or anything, most plugins
are disabled actually. Just trying to figure out which one is
misbehaving, as spamd grows to 4Gb of resident memory usage, at 100%
CPU, and eventual
Hello,
We recently started having problems on a few servers with spamd
processes starting to hog RAM (3G++ per child) and we are noting some
timeouts in the logs. as well, we are seeing this msg
Apr 18 08:48:24 spamd[2451]: plugin: eval failed: __alarm__ignore__(156)
Apr 18 08:58:25 spamd[1
Hello,
Why use the link-local address?
Have a look at this thread;
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg58685.html
Link local is all I have ;) I know next to nothing about v6, but it is
coming... so testing things.
Off topic: I have currently one fixed IPv4 addres
On 2011-01-15 14:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just assigned records to my DNS, and spamc/spamd fails.
I have a DNS alias spamd for a server.
jarif@lancaster:~$ host spamd
spamd.fredriksson.dy.fi is an alias for lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi.
lancaster.fredriksson.dy.fi has address 10.123.2
On 2010-11-02 17:01, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how
complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and
Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could
be used in conjunction with others?
Would this
In a followup to
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/151470;
Is it possible to set the priority on RBL rules to run after rules, or
not at all if shortcircuited?
I tried:
priority RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET -300
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -300
priority RCVD_IN_PSBL -300
priority R
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Chris Conn wrote:
I upgraded to SA 3.3.1 on a CentOS system using Perl 5.8.5 and I
occasionally get this error;
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x00,
immediately after start byte 0xc3) in pattern match (m//) at
/var/lib
Hello,
I upgraded to SA 3.3.1 on a CentOS system using Perl 5.8.5 and I
occasionally get this error;
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x00,
immediately after start byte 0xc3) in pattern match (m//) at
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_activ
Hello,
Has anyone written any rules to catch the following types of spam
http://nisk.creenet.com/~cconn/sa/
They consist of a few lines of text (sometimes), and a .gif attachment that
is in fact some penny stock being pushed.
Thanks in advance,
Chris
e (according to your email) responsible.
Claiming non-socialist ideals will get you nowhere, particularily if you
send your concerns to the wrong people.
Good luck,
Chris Conn
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
FYI
Just had a report from a user regarding
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=66.249.82.205
64.233.185.27 is an mx ( 5 ) for xproxy.gmail.com
64.233.185.27 is an mx ( 5 ) for gmail.com
That could be effecting quite a lot of people...
D
Lower down,
Hello,
When I run the sa-learn --force-expire on a regular basis, I eventually
run into this:
debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 0.75 * max: 562500
debug: bayes: token count: 675802, final goal reduction size: 113302
debug: bayes: First pass? Current: 1124120405, Last: 1124089241, atime:
Eddy Beliveau wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to all for your replies
I cannot upgrade right now, the current academic semester is not yet
completed
In the mean time, I will try Chris Conn's solution:
rawbody __LW_URI_CR1 /href=\"[^"]*\r[^\n]/is
full__LW_URI_CR2 /href=\"[^"]*\r[^\n]/
Eddy
Have you tried updating to a newer version?
I suspect it will be many peoples first suggestion.
Alan
Hello,
Someone correct me if I am wrong, however the multi-line URI spams with
ampersands need a patch that is not yet integrated into the default
3.0.3 distribution.
http://bugzil
Eddy Beliveau wrote:
Hi!
I'm running spamassassin 2.4 with pamCopURI 0.24 and it work perfectly.
Thanks ;-)
My current problem is that I cannot get rid of those online pharmacy
spams. (see attached picture). The email contains a picture and many
words in font size 1.
Am I the only on
Hello,
I have just gotten around to upgrading my 2.64 SA servers to 3.0.3. I
have read the FAQ and searched the archives, so if the following
question has been asked or covered, please push me in the right
direction and I will be on my way
Is there any documentation as to why the BAYES_
Matt Thoene wrote:
Does anyone have a good custom arithmetic score for spam that has a
whole bunch of o's and l's replaced with zeros and "|"? Example of
part of an l replacement spam body below...
Yap International, Inc.(YPIL)
VoIP techno|ogy requires no computer or high speed Internet connection
Hello,
I have been googling for a few days trying to find a way to count the
number of matches and score accordingly.
Let's say for example I have something against the letter A. I would
like to write a rule that scores 0.01 for every letter A matched in a
given text. So, 5 A-s would score 0.
28 matches
Mail list logo
