l Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:10 AM
To: Chris Blaise
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.2 available
try using "strace -fp {PID}" to see what is causing those
deaths...
Ch
ROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 9:06 AM
To: Chris Blaise
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.2 available
Chris Blaise writes:
> When starting up on a Perl 5.6.1 system under x86 Linux, spamd goes
> into a child spawn/die loop becau
When starting up on a Perl 5.6.1 system under x86 Linux, spamd goes
into a child spawn/die loop because of the fix for bug 5518 which replaces
the previous set uid/gid routines fails and causes the newly spawned child
to immediately die.
Is Perl 5.6.1 no longer the lowest support
We've recently upgraded from 3.0.1 to 3.0.3 and started having
problems which sound very similar to bug 4310.
In trying to figure out what could have changed in spamd.raw between
those versions I looked at the CVS commits under
tags/spamassassin_release_3_0_1/ , tags/spamassassin_
If you use exim, check out:
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
It allows SA scanning at the MTA level and includes a GreyListing
pluging for SA3. You should be able to configure exim to only allow it for
certain recipient addreses but you'd have to do that research your
I agree it's a very misleading term.
The easiest and most appropriate term I've heard is "historical
averaging".
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 7:51 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL c
s the first time
its happened.
And any not both files?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bayes databases losing file ownership
Chris Blaise wrote:
>
> spa
spamd runs as mail and that's what the bayes_ files are owned as. A
few days ago we started seeing an increase in spam and looking into the
problem today, I found that the bayes_toks file (but not bayes_seen) was
owned as root.
Anyone have any ideas what could cause this?
The biggest performance benefit you'll see is if you use spamd. The
pre-forking of children makes an incredible amount of difference.
We ran tests with networking and bayes disabled and the improvement
was over 2x.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: scohen [mailto:[EMAI
al Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 2:41 PM
To: Chris Blaise
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes scoring weirdness?
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:32:42PM -0600, Chris Blaise wrote:
> The rules were ALL_TRUSTED,MIS
In experimenting with white/blacklists and bayes, I got a message
that was in a blacklist but learned as ham!
2004 Sep 7 14:22:02 server spamd[8949]: identified spam (197.2/5.0) for
nobody:8 in 0.6 seconds, 191 bytes.
2004 Sep 7 14:22:02 server spamd[8949]: logmsg: result: Y 197 -
ALL_T
Another reason for SPF/SenderID vs. PTR records is unfortunately
while technically possible to delegate, many ISPs don't allow their
customers to manage the reverse records.
Chris
12 matches
Mail list logo
