Re: negative scores for spam

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: No, I don't still have the messages that were incorrectly trained. So... it appears that wiping out the bayes database is the way to go. One final question for this then: is there a "sa-learn" option I should use for this, or is doing a simple "rm bayes*" in the .

Re: negative scores for spam

.spamassassin directory preferred? -- Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes chris-bar...@tamu.eduYahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager MSN IM: ch...@txbarnes.com Department of Physics ph: 979-845-7801 Texas A&M Unive

Re: negative scores for spam

fairly common problem. The question is: How does one fix the problem after it occurs? Is there a FAQ page with step-by-step instructions a person could use? -- Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes chris-bar...@tamu.eduYahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems

Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00

Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:05 -0500, Chris Barnes wrote: >> >> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >>> >>> The AWL score for this message is minimal (one can tell by calculating >>> >>> the stock rules&#

Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00

9 01:22:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <63342009319223327...@itsjss.com> X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 4 X-EM-Registration: #01E0530610F50E00AC00 From: "IT Solution Journal" To: "Chris Barnes" As John said, AWL is a pure score averager, based on the sender's address and

Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00

Kai Schaetzl wrote: Chris Barnes wrote on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:06:10 -0500: I have purged my bayes db and issued sa-learn to rebuild it. How? sa-learn --clear But the Bayes_00 score persists. Are you learning those very messages as spam? I find that just learning a message as spam

Spam with AWL and Bayes00

our own domain) get into the AWL to begin with? Q2: Is there a system-wide AWL and/or Bayes db that I need to purge/clean up? -- Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes chris-bar...@tamu.eduYahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager MSN IM

Re: Procmail for site wide usage

to the proper folders. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x (SOLVED)

copied the local.cf.rpmbuild to local.cf and used it 'as-is'. Restarted SA and everything now works. Perhaps something in the UPDATE file and website should be included to only re-used old custom rules only after the install/upgrade? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

sin.pm line 1682. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

Chris Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So how do I go about resurrecting SA so that it runs now? Just for grins, I downloaded the CPAN version (which shows to be 3.0.2) and used the instructions there. The install went off without any error messages, but I get the same results

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

ting SA so that it runs now? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:27 PM -0600 Chris Barnes > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >>/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod > >

Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

erl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1671. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x

Does anyone have a good yum update repository to upgrade SA to 3.x (from 2.63)? Is an update like that recommended? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

sa-learn on different box

(ssh) to this box. /home is nfs mounted from box1 /usr/bin/sa-learn is on box1 (obviously). If I simply copy sa-learn from box1 to box2, can the users run it without having to install the entire SA package on box2? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes

Re: [OT] FUN: Something to send your family members!

fessional life I ran a help desk call center! -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes

Re: Subject line

ve programmed our email clients to > automatically sort our email. Those of us in favor got voted down. You could do what I do and read the messages via the gmane newsgroup mirror. NOTHING shows up in my inbox, yet I see everything I want. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +