On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:15 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
>
> > I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
>
> if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
> local mails, since repution is to be local, not
Hellow Thomas,
> But it drops it into the spam folder every time. So when I'm sending
> emails to someone's alias, they have to check their spam folder. Even
> when they mark it as "not spam," GMail still drops it into the spam
> folder. It's very frustrating.
>
There is a filtering rule in Gm
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 08:34 +, Marc wrote:
> > > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> > >
> > > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> > >
> > > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
>
> > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
>
> +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
>
Hellow Benny,
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recentl
>
> This is not a good advice. Whoever filters SPF at SMTP time will
> reject that
> message. Gmail is not the only mail service available.
Hellow Matus,
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
>
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
> comes
> into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally
> just
> create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
> forwarded to the president's "real" email address, say
> presidents_real_
Dear Matus,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 15.03.22 22:21, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>>By chance, i found some site dkimwl.org on googling. Well i like very
>>much dkim based white-lists. How credible is that dkimwl.org? And how
>>can i use that stuff with SpamAssassin
Hello,
By chance, i found some site dkimwl.org on googling. Well i like very
much dkim based white-lists. How credible is that dkimwl.org? And how
can i use that stuff with SpamAssassin?
Thanks in advance!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea
--
^고맙습니다 _救濟蒼生_ 감사합니다_^))//
Hellow Greg,
Greg Troxel writes:
> [...]
> Lots of people think SPF is silly. And spammers spamming from a domain
> they control can even dkim/dmarc. So I agree that actual data would be
> interesting.
I totally agree with you, thanks!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Dear Thomas,
Thomas Barth 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <5eddfcdb-957c-e7c0-b133-a40c7ab37...@txbweb.de> 에서》:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to use geoiplookup with Spamassassin? I want to reject
> all mails as spam not send in my country or another second country,
> but accept whitelisted mailing list addresses
Marcin Mirosław writes:
> I'm using SA-3.3.1, NetAddr-IP-4.033.
> May you give any advice?
Sorry, i don't know about 3.3.1 Version. By the way there is somewhat
similar patchs for IPv6. You would check out as following:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/
Sincerely,
--
소여물 황병희(
Michael Scheidell writes:
> On 11/15/10 11:43 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>>
>> As it stands now, the SPF spec permits so much waffling that it might as
>> well not be used.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> then don't use it:
I don't use SPF, thanks!
--
소여물 황병희(黃炳熙) | .. 출항 15분전..
"Johnny, not in the face,
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, SM wrote:
At 23:01 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
So then, you're saying the behavior for ipv4 and ipv6 is somehow
different?
If you start spamd without specifying the IP addresses to listen on,
spamd will listen on the 127.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> On 10.11.08 04:11, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>>>> Well, i don't care. I accept the emails passed by DKIM, anyway..
>
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> so you intentionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> mouss wrote:
>>> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>>>> mouss wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> let's start with DKIM.
>>>>> do you have
>>>>> loa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>> mouss wrote:
>> [...]
>>> let's start with DKIM.
>>
>>> do you have
>>> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM
>>
>> + i'm use with fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss wrote:
[...]
> let's start with DKIM.
>
> do you have
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM
+ i'm use with following rule ;;
score DKIM_VERIFIED -45.3
byunghee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iEYEA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah Anderson wrote:
[...]
> Report them where exactly?
>
> Here is an example one I received recently, note the hideously low bayes
> score on this one, caused it to autolearn as ham even, grr.
>
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 20:00:45 2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Ries wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I just want to know some opinions on the following DNS Setup for a mail
> server:
>
> # host -t MX example.com
> example.com mail is handled by 100 mail.example.com.
>
> # host mail.example.com
> mail.example.com
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 14:09 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 04:46 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > The Rule in local.cf:
> > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mx2.freebsd.org
> >
> > The Result:
> > http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~b
The Rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mx2.freebsd.org
The Result:
http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/stuff/IPv6-SpamAssassin-TESTING
Patched by:
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ipv6/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-ipv6-20070603.diff.gz
respect,
bh
--
"I am willing to sacrifice my commercial int
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 08:25 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:27 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> >
> >> Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>
> >>> K Anand wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I have w
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:27 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> > K Anand wrote:
> >> I have whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my conf.
> >> As per the docs, they say that whitelist_from will act on
> >>
> >> Envelope-Sender
> >> Resent-Sender
> >> X-Envelope-From
> >>
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 08:55 -0600, Dean Clapper wrote:
> How do I setup spamassassin not to automatically create
> /home/user/.spamassassin folder. If I create a new email account it
> automatically creates the folder.
man spamd
-x, --nouser-config Disable user (...)
res
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 15:09 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> K Anand wrote:
> > Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:43 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> >>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>>> On 13.11.07 15:52, K An
hi,
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:43 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 13.11.07 15:52, K Anand wrote:
> >>
> >> Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
> >
> > configure your smtp server to add DNS data to Received: line.
> > *list_from_rcvd doesn't work
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 08:04 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-Spa
hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 04:56 -0800, SpankTheSpam wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have installed URICountry plugin along with p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 and
> amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 and have added few rules, and one to test it in my
> local.cf:
[...]
well, imho, its using is not fair to over the world. becaus
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 14:58 +0530, K Anand wrote:
> K Anand wrote:
> >
> >> Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>> As an alternative, you can use whitelist_from_spf or
> >>> whitelist_from_rcvd on the list's return-path. From there, you can
> >>> configure shortcircuiting to bypass the rest of SA an
ah.. sorry.. the subject was wrong..
"ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from" ===> "ipv6 and whitelist_from_rcvd"
respect,
bh
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:27 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
> > anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
>
> You can go back to using ipv
the my spamassassin rule is as follow:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mx2.freebsd.org
and here is the recieved header with spamassassin:
Received: by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix, from userid 59)
id 66A1D3ECD; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:00:05 +0900 (KST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas
r not many of the false positive reports so far.
>
> Any comments or constructive advice would be appreciated.
For the solution,
I think you would better talk with [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;;
Sincerely,
--
Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * আমি তোমাকে ভালোবাসি
InZealBomb, Kyungpook Natio
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
--
Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As he drove Johnney home, Nino thought that if that was success, he didn't
want it.
-- the Nino Valenti's inside, "Chapter 13", page 189
34 matches
Mail list logo
