Mark Martinec wrote:
> The updated patch is now attached to
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3364
> (replaces my previous two).
>
> In addition to previous tests, it now also resets corrupted AWL
> record when it sees one.
>
>> I don't know if it's an option but i could
Mark Martinec schreef:
First, UML is a virtual machine infrastructure.
See http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
Now you are talking!
See:
http://fixunix.com/openssl/518688-re-uml-devel-dev-random-problems-fp-regis
ters-corruption.html
Seems like it was fixed in February 2008:
UML - Fix
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Benedict,
>
>> This again suggests that something is broken with my AWL. I think i'd
>> better delete it.
>> As it seems now, the only thing strange left is the AWL & related NaN.
>>
>
> Please don't delete your AWL. I'll provide a patch which will reset a
> bad entry
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:04 +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>
>> i have tested with another spam message that has a combined score of
>> 22.5 and it's not flagged as spam.
>> The full debug log is here:
>> http://www.heim
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> as i said, to my knowledge, i'm not using any custom headers and i
>> asked how i could know for sure as it's not clear to me how to check
>
> Ah, sorry, kind of forgot about that. Well, posting your cf files is one
> option. ;) Another one is to read the configurat
Mark Martinec schreef:
Benedict,
Thing is, what is causing the nan?
My guess is that a NaN somehow got into your AWL database.
I have reopened bug 3364, and attached a richer patch:
"Deal with NaN in AutoWhitelist and PerMsgStatus"
which includes my previous patch and also instrume
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Some more interesting stuff from /var/log/syslog:
Oct 14 09:15:08 loki spamd[1274]: auto-whitelist: attempt to add a nan
to AWL entry ignored
177 Oct 14 09:15:08 loki spamd[1274]: !! rules: score 'nan' for rule
'AWL' in 'AWL: ' '
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Guenther, Benedict,
>
>>> My guess is that a NaN somehow got into your AWL database.
>> Things are much more complicated, or rather weird, than that.
>>
>> According to Benedict's reports and pasted snippets, he got an NaN score
>> for at least 3 rules: FROM_ILLEGAL_CHARS, A
Karsten Bräckelmann schreef:
> Benedict, since I asked about custom headers before, it might be a good
> idea to carefully check the config and answer my previous question.
> Since you're not using custom rules, but change scores, you likely
> copied (read: inherited) that part from your previous c
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>
> I got a message that again scored a nan for MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE
> The mail is available here:
> http://paste-it.net/public/r3df8b2/
>
> Weird thing is that the lines i added to PerMsgStatus.pm weren't showing up.
>
> Regards,
>
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks Mark and Guenther.
>
> I patched the score part as indicated in Mark's mail and when i run
> spamassassin in
> debug mode, i do see a message popping up with results to a NaN score:
> [6443] warn: rules: score
Guenther wrote:
>> Do you use customized headers? (Sorry, don't have the OP, but IIRC I
>> spotted some.) What are the results of the snippets in comment 4, and
>> what about comment 11?
>>
>
> A question is for Benedict I suppose.
>
>
>> Puzzling, how he gets NaN in the first place. Bened
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>
>
> I want to reply to my previous message with some more info but i'm not
> able to do so, my messages keep getting flagged as spam.
> Very annoying, first spamassassin doesn't work like it should here and i
&
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
I want to reply to my previous message with some more info but i'm not
able to do so, my messages keep getting flagged as spam.
Very annoying, first spamassassin doesn't work like it should here and i
can't even ask for help now :)
Who do i contact to sol
Hi,
i'm using Debian stable and spamassassin v3.2.3.
Recently i noticed a few spam mails getting through although the
combined scores should be high enough.
The email is however flagged as not being spam, the score is set to 3.9 but
should actually be way higher.
I also encountered something simil
15 matches
Mail list logo
