Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I think it's more about spammers, law and security of (mostly) home
> computers. In my employer's company we also notice spam increase from our
> network etc. and google as free mail provider is also just the victim.
Victims? IMNTBHO, if a company is going to provid
Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from Google,
>> using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a Google property)
>> URLs. I've been submitting them to URIBL but naturally, they're constan
dvesely wrote:
> My server manager tells me that my Windows version of SpamAssasin cannot
> reject email at the SMTP level. This is only possibble in the Unix version.
> True or False?
>
> If false, can you give me a link to instructions on enabling this feature or
> any known workaround please?
