t necessarily mean that
something is wrong. You may consider upgrading SA to 3.3.
The problem is that almost all messages has tests=[none]. It is not a
punctual problem.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Apl
otherwise the difference
in environment may cause different behaviour. Try something like:
# su vscan -c 'spamassassin -t -D I have run it with amavis user. I attach you the output of the command.
There you can see some checks (dns checks), but it seems that none of
them is passed.
--
A
El 25/11/10 12:48, Tom Kinghorn escribió:
On 2010/11/25 01:10 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
We are running spamassassin (with postfix and amavisd-new) for a long
time.
Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
have you tried a debug?
spamassassin -t -D &
on't have it in internal_networks
neither trusted_networks.
Any idea?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica_(___V
Tfo: 868887590
Fax: 86337
El 08/11/10 12:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
El 28/10/10 15:03, John Hardin escribió:
IPv4 addresses are numbers (uint4 to be precise), dotted quad notation
is just the
El 28/10/10 15:03, John Hardin escribió:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
IPv4 addresses are numbers (uint4 to be precise), dotted quad notation
is just the most-human-readable way to represent them. It is
lot of things more.
If the purpose of this pattern is to much against an IP address it
should be (more or less) \d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3} or something
like that.
Is there any reason for this pattern being so general? Or this is a bug?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de
onally lead to FPs because
it only looks for the local part of the email address.
OK, I'll check this. Thank you.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica
=[]
But I don't find why this messages is BLACKLISTED. Could you help me?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica_(___V
Tfo: 868887590
Fax: 86337
On 06/01/10 03:49, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 1/5/2010 6:09 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run
spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to
restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin
e spamd
daemon? Is there any way to use spamd daemon with amavis? Is it worth in
a mail gateway with hugh loads?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica
Hello,
I would bet that I restarted amavis and spamassassin, but it seems I
didn't :-(. I have restarted amavis and spamassassin and AWL is not
being check now. The only thing to do is to comment the line
in /etc/spamassassin/v310.pre.
Sorry for the bothers.
--
Angel L.
El mié, 20-06-2007 a las 12:06 +0200, Uwe Kiewel escribió:
> Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > How is the correct way to deactive AWL?
> >
>
> found in my amavisd.conf:
>
> $sa_auto_whitelist =
/local.cf. With this it seems that AWL is not
running yet.
But it seems to be still loaded, because this option must not be
recognized if AWL is unload, isn't it?
How is the correct way to deactive AWL?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías
even tried to run spamd with -c or with -x.
>
We had the same problem. After lot of checks it resulted to be the more
silly thing: a permission problem with the bayes files (the amavis user
couldn't read them). Check that your amavis user can use these files.
--
Angel L. Mate
that this just synchronized
> the journal with the database. As you have copied everything across to
> the slave from the master, it should be in an identical state, until
> you run the sync, at which stage the DBs are slightly out of sync. I
> am not sure but suspect that the problem ma
El mar, 07-11-2006 a las 14:28 +0200, Johann Spies escribió:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:22:31AM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > I am running site-wide bayes, not individual bayes databases.
>
> I am also interested in the answer to your question. Do you stop spamd
> when
El mar, 07-11-2006 a las 00:58 -0900, John Andersen escribió:
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 00:33, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > so one of them classified it as spam and the other not. The only
> > difference I've found is that the master hit the BAYES_60 and the sl
d it as spam and the other not. The only
difference I've found is that the master hit the BAYES_60 and the slave
the BAYES_80.
Why this different score? am I synchronizing my servers the right way?
Thanks in advance.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecn
m was still there.
Any help?
Thanks in advance.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica_(___V
Tfo: 968367590
Fax: 968398337
vance.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica_(___V
Tfo: 968367590
Fax: 968398337
21 matches
Mail list logo
