On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-06-12 15:20, Andy Dills wrote:
> > 300,000 queries per day...per server? per CIDR? What is the delimiter?
> >
> > Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per day.
>
> That is pro
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 00:19 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > The most important argument for me to keep it enabled by default is
> > > simple. Small organizations and
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 10:42 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> > score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0
> > score URIBL_DBL_ERROR 0
> > score RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
> >
> > I think those are the only queries that generate lookups against Sp
y have the right to charge for their data, but I question whether it's
appropriate for an open-source project to generate sales leads in this
manner.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
ad';
$sysret = system("$update");
if (!$sysret) {
print "New rules!\n";
$compret = system("$compile");
if (!$compret) {
print "Compiled Correctly!\n";
system("$amavis");
}
}
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
efer to the wisdom of the people who invest their time and effort to
provide the services and develop the software that the rest of us have
come to rely on. If you guys don't have a problem with it, then that's
good enough for me.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
le. Somebody help me here.
This was way too long but I'm waiting on a couple buildworlds and the more
I think about this the more shady it feels to me.
Good luck regardless,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jason Haar wrote:
> Andy Dills wrote:
> > For instance, if we ran a cacheing nameserver on each of our mailservers,
> > would you have ever noticed us?
> Err - are you saying you are generating >500K requests/day against that ONE
> RBL domain - and
the
> heavy hitters to query the public mirrors, thats their choice.
If you think 500k queries a day is a heavy hitter, you're off your rocker.
I suspect most of the heavy hitters have their load distributed among many
source IPs...do you aggregate query volume data by cidr block
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Rob McEwen wrote:
> Andy Dills wrote:
> > ...the people in charge of uribl.com have decided to set a pretty low
> > threshold for blacklisting DNS servers from querying, demanding that people
> > who hit that threshold pay them a rather exorbitant
revenue streams.
I really don't care much either way, for me it's a done deal, I'm
disabling the tests on my mail servers and advising others to do the same.
I'm just wondering if the community at large is aware of this and has an
opinion.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
shes reaches a reasonably low number, it
becomes faster to rescan the image than to go through every single stored
hash to see if you've already scanned a similar image.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
e.
You can score certain returns (regexable) with high scores, and
other returns with lower scores. Nobody said anything about blocking mail
at an SMTP level because it contains one sentence.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
eching spoils it for
> everyone and themselves.
People are still getting PDF spams?
I'm finding with a current version of SA and the sane security clamav
signatures, that none have gotten through for a few days now.
Do we really need a PDFinfo at this point?
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
he entire
database is a requirement, hashing is a performance hit rather than a
performance gain.
A better solution might be a seperate daemon that holds the hashes in
memory, to which you submit the hash being considered.
Honestly, I have been extremely impressed with having hashing turned
completely off.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, decoder wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
>
once per day...dropped the response time from
2-3s to .01-.05s on queries, and eliminated the suddenly large
and customer-annoying mailqueues.
Thanks for a cool piece of software though! Very impressive overall.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
related to FuzzyOcr, but I'm
not positive.
Is anybody else experiencing this, or have any suggestions as to how I
should approach debugging this issue?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
