Tom Hendrikx:
> but postfix has a feature that can check the MX and NS
> records of the envelope sender or hostname of the connecting ip.
I know and use that.
> If these are all the same, you could block connections based on those.
that's intersting, no idea how to com
Hello,
today we came up with the idea to look at the domain age.
It may be a criteria for otherwise perfect messages.
Is there something I could ask with a domainname and receive the age
as answer?
Andreas
Andreas Schulze:
Kasten,
sorry -> Karsten
works wonderful. I now have a list of hostnames SA find in the messagebody
as new header! Thanks. Much simpler then I thought...
Andreas
Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Since SA 3.4, there are template tags which already might be all you
> need. The template tags _URIHOSTS_ and _URIDOMAINS_ list all extracted
> (and to be looked up) URIs, including full hostname and domain only
> respectively. No path information.
>
> add_header all UriHo
Hello,
I have to get an overview on http links in a specific mail stream.
My plan is to use spamassassin as it could parse message body much better then
I do :-)
There is a plugin URIDNSBL that could fire dns queries for every url found.
That's fine for me, as the url is then in my dnsserver log.
Zitat von Mark Martinec :
Curl uses environment variable http_proxy (lowercase),
same as wget and LWP (libwww-perl) and similar tools.
Don't know where you got the uppercase variant.
Good point. The uppercase version simply did it's job.
I just tried the lowercase version and sa-update work a
Hello,
thanks for that great software. The only problem I found is an issue
with sa-update:
My network require to use a http proxy incl. authentication. To load updates
I currently (sa-3.3.2) set HTTP_PROXY="..." for sa-update.
That does not work anymore in 3.4
As I use curl I now have to c
Zitat von Florian Lindner :
Since we move our server (and upgrade from oldstabe to stable) I want to
reconsider how I organize mails serverside.
Debian, MTA is postfix, MDA maildrop (like procmail), IMAP was
courier, will be dovecot.
if you use dovecot, maildrop is obsolete.
deliver your m
Am 11.10.2013 17:05 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On behalf of the PMC, the ASF SpamAssassin Project is pleased to
> announce the availability of our third release candidate for 3.4.0.
Hi all!
thanks for that great software first!
I found two minor issues in perl documentation and attach a patch.
Th
Hello,
Every mail MUST have exact one From header (RFC5322, 3.6).
Same RFC, Section 3.6.2 allow a from header contain a list of senders
(Why ???)
In this case exact one sender header MUST be present and it MUST NOT a list.
Are there SA Rules to score a missing or multiple from header?
Does an
Hello,
today I found messages with strage headers: they had an empty value.
example:
From: ...
To: ...
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Date: ...
Is this against any rfc and could/should [not?] be rejected or used to
identify spam?
Thanks
Andreas
Am 29.03.2013 02:36 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 00:56 +, John Levine wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell spamassassin to look at the A-R header rather
> > than trying to rerun the SPF and DKIM checks itself?
in sa-3.3.2/Plugin/SPF.pm is still code like this:
if ($hdr
Am So, 18.11.2012, 18:48 schrieb dar...@chaosreigns.com:
>> are you sure? I will report it to my ISP
>
> No, I'm not sure, which is why I said "I believe" and "But I haven't
> actually looked into those details lately. We need better documentation
> of this". But I am very confident somethin
Am Do, 6.09.2012, 13:08 schrieb Andreas Schulze:
> Is it possible to use the result of the milter in the same way SA would do
> with its own SPF implementation?
> Than the SPF information could have an influance to the spamcore.
I run smf-spf milter (sf.net/projects/smfs) and applied a
Am 06.09.2012 17:08 schrieb Ned Slider:
> If your milter adds the Received-SPF header before the mail is
> passed to SA then maybe you could simply write a rule to check the
> Received-SPF header and score as you see appropriate.
Yes, the Milter add a Received-SPF header.
Could you point me to som
Hello,
for technical reasons I have no Mail::SPF::Query. So my SA has no "view" to the
spf settings of an incomming mail.
But I run an SPF-Milter in front of SA without Mail::SPF::Query. That Filter
adds an Received-SPF header to the mails but do not reject.
Is it possible to use the result of
Hello,
I like to ask you how knows/uses MTX (http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx)
Thanks for a shot response offlist.
Andreas
System#Name_servers
other resolvers installable by users are
- unbound ( http://unbound.net )
- dnscache ( http://cr.yp.to/dnscache.html )
- bind (off course)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_server_software
--
Andreas Schulze
anks
--
Viele Grüße
Andreas Schulze
Am 15.05.2011 22:29 schrieb Andreas Schulze:
> But sometimes the perldoc produces mangages with errors:
and some other manpages changes ...
Attached my other patch.
Andreas
--
#
# Andreas Schulze
# ht
ail/SpamAssassin/Util/DependencyInfo.pm
- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm
Attached my patch.
Andreas
--
#
# Andreas Schulze
# https://andreasschulze.de
#
# GnuPG Key-ID: A7DBA67F, https://andreasschulze.de/sca.
http://andreasschulze.de/tmp/quarantined
What could I change,
that my mails no longer matches the mentioned rules ?
Thanks
--
Viele Grüße
Andreas Schulze
Hi,
> -forget Forget a message
I do
sa-learn --forget ; sa-learn --spam
right ?
--
Viele Grüße
Andreas Schulze
Hello
Im using spamassassin inside amavisd-new to filter mails.
Today I noticed a mail with these headers:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MTX_NONE=0.001,
Hello,
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DROP FAQ
mention as very last point to use the Spamhaus Drop list with SA.
is anybody doing this and can explain it in detail ?
Thanks
Andreas
dreas
--
#
# Andreas Schulze
# https://andreasschulze.de
#
# GnuPG Key-ID: A7DBA67F, https://andreasschulze.de/sca.asc
# GnuPG Fingerprint: 14C1 39A8 CE6D 6BE0 28C6 5652 03B5 6793 A7DB A67F
#
# $Id: .signature,v 1.3 2007-12-27 21:13:36 sca Exp $
Hello,
I call SA from amavisd-new and found this warning in my logfile.
Aug 23 11:36:27 taro amavis[32405]: (32405) _WARN: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: Can't locate auto/NetAddr/IP/full6.al in @INC
(@INC
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.0
/usr/local/share/perl/5
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:57:29PM -0500, Dave Funk wrote:
> For some reason when you set that "options inet6" your system is not
> willing to fall back to IPv4 mode (or a bug is preventing it).
> That's what you need to look into (until such time as
> spamassassin.apache.org gets v6 connected ;)
date runs as expected.
Any suggestions ?
Andreas
--
############
#
# Andreas Schulze
# https://andreasschulze.de
#
# GnuPG Key-ID: A7DBA67F, https://andreasschulze.de/sca.asc
# GnuPG Fingerprint: 14C1 39A8 CE6D 6BE0 28C6 5652 03B5 6793 A7DB A67F
spamassassin 2.60
background: we currently test Yahoo! domainkeys. this system signs all headers
an body.
domainkeys assume, that headers are added only at top.
Headers, added by spamassassin at the end, destroy the domainkey-signature.
thanks
Andreas Schulze
30 matches
Mail list logo
