Matt Kettler wrote:
Chip wrote:
The problem is, it seems that sa-learn is ignoring the -u / --user= flag.
Of course it's ignoring it. There is no -u flag in sa-learn. ONLY spamc
and spamd accept that flag.
sa-learn uses the userid of the user that calls it. Period.
No offence meant here.
Michael Bellears wrote:
"I'm using 3.0.2 on a debian woody box. Its from www.backports.org
(great site)"
Ok, so you're using Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Debian. Are you
using Sendmail, qmail, courier, or postfix? I honestly don't
know that Debian uses as a default mailserver.
Exim.
Ok
Matthew Lenz wrote:
- Original Message - From: "AltGrendel"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: my girlfriend is getting ticked :)
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The
false-negative was labeled 99% spam by Bayes
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The
false-negative was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see any RBL checks, which might have made the difference on
this one, if it's already been seen and flagged. Do you have
Net::DNS installed and the RLB tests enab
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:46 AM 3/14/2005, Paul Reilly wrote:
Is it possible to dump the bayesian tokens in
human readable format still?
No.
In sa 3.0+ they are base-64 encodings of the SHA1 hash of the token.
The hash is for all practical purposes not reversible.
This is done in part for privac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:06:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Over the past month I've seen a ~25% dropoff in the amount of spam we're
receiving on a daily basis. Anyone else seeing a significant drop in
spam recently?
(Replying to self)
The amount of spam we're rece
Yes, after much struggle, the wiki is back on line.
First and foremost, I'd like to thank Matt and infotex.com for hosting
the site. Chris Santerre also has my thanks for acting as a go-between
to get me in touch with Matt. They really stepped up to the plate as far
as I'm conserned. They have m
Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
Hi!
I'm just curious whether a very strange spam is send to
'many' users. Today many addresses here were hit by
absolutely *useless* messages, which *look* like real
spam, as long as you look at the subject, which ist
the often recurring theme of 'telephone-cd with reverse
you know of anyone looking for an Email
administrator in the Mid-Atlantic region, please let me know.
AltGrendel
--- End Message ---
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 09:21, Anton Krall wrote:
> Whats he rules-de-jour homepage?
>
http://www.exit0.us
--
I've noticed about at 10% decrease in spam since Florida started having
all those problems with tropical weather.
Anyone else notice this?
I'm not trying to bash Florida, just something I noticed in the logs.
It's amazing how much better
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:37, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> (technical information about SpamAssassin 3.0.0 release)
>
> SpamAssassin 3.0.0 is released! SpamAssassin 3.0.0 is a major update and
> includes a number of new email and anti-spam technologies.
>
Is there an ETA for the CPAN release?
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
