Re: Parsing of uncoded UTF-8 message

2005-07-25 Thread Alex S Moore
Matt Kettler wrote: Alex S Moore wrote: I have messages that give this error from sa-learn. SA is 3.0.4. Perl is 5.8.7. HTML-Parser is 3.45 Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities at /opt/csw/share/perl/csw/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182. Attached is an

Parsing of uncoded UTF-8 message

2005-07-25 Thread Alex S Moore
I have messages that give this error from sa-learn. SA is 3.0.4. Perl is 5.8.7. HTML-Parser is 3.45 Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities at /opt/csw/share/perl/csw/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182. Attached is an example, which is ham. The HTML::Parser man

Re: dcc / razor

2005-07-05 Thread Alex S Moore
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:48:22 + Ronan McGlue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use. > I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to > find any liscencing info on either site. Anyone got any URLS/ info > regarding t

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0pre1 PRERELEASE available!

2005-06-19 Thread Alex S Moore
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:11:43AM -0500, Alex S Moore wrote: I cannot find where to put the dcc user options like dcc_dccifd_path. If I leave them in /local.cf, I get info messages about skipping dcc. Did you enable the DCC plugin? Due to license issues with DCC

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0pre1 PRERELEASE available!

2005-06-19 Thread Alex S Moore
Justin Mason wrote: hi all -- it's time to broaden the pool of 3.1.0 testing -- so here's a prerelease. It's functionally quite close to what 3.1.0 will be, although we haven't yet done the rescoring mass-checks and Perceptron run, and there may be one or two more patches going in before the ful

Re: SA Performance under Solaris -w- Sendmail

2005-05-12 Thread Alex S Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The production server we are trying to run on only has 128mb of memory. I can't believe we got a machine with that little, but it happened. I might try running only 2 children of SPAMD, refreshing the processes every 5 messages or so to see if that will work, but I'd s

Re: SA Performance under Solaris -w- Sendmail

2005-05-12 Thread Alex S Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8 and 9, Perl 5.8.3. Ran the test differently and got different results. I sent the 573 messages from a different host. Both the send

Re: SA Performance under Solaris -w- Sendmail

2005-05-12 Thread Alex S Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8 and 9, Perl 5.8.3. This may not be much help. I put 573 messages in a subfolder and ran the following script. I watched `prstat -n

Re: SA Performance under Solaris -w- Sendmail

2005-05-12 Thread Alex S Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been experiencing and documenting a pretty severe performance problem with SA versions 3.0.1 through 3.1x (nightly) under Solaris 8 and 9, Perl 5.8.3. What is the simplest way for me to see this problem? I use CSW packages for sendmail, MD, SA, perl and others. R

Re: Relay Country

2005-02-04 Thread Alex S Moore
Jeff Koch wrote: What does one need to do to activate the relay country tests? We have the CPAN module installed and added this line to local.cf loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry I do not use that plugin, but I would uncomment the entry in init.pre and not touch local.cf.

Re: bayes?!

2005-01-10 Thread Alex S Moore
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:07:36 + Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think he means.. > > perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf Actually, both man and perldoc work for me. I build on Solaris, so it may be different from what the op has. Sorry if I confused things, but the questions loo

Re: bayes?!

2005-01-10 Thread Alex S Moore
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:02:43 -0500 (EST) "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No manual entry for Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf ?! > > do i have to install this separetly or it comes together with > Mail::SpamAssassin? I suppose that depends on how and where you did the install. I create a

Re: bayes?!

2005-01-10 Thread Alex S Moore
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:32:05 -0500 (EST) "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if spamd reads individual user-pref the bayes_path should be set up in > each individual file, correct? the local.cf would be ignored? right? > and if i use vpopmail the db files must have read permissions only

Re: feed MimeDefanged mail to sa-learn?

2005-01-02 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:27:52 -0600 Keith Whyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what occured to me later is that when MD sends a message to > spamassassin to analyse, it hasn't modified it. If that message scores > more that the auto_learn_threshold, then sa will auto learn the > original, right? it's

Re: feed MimeDefanged mail to sa-learn?

2005-01-01 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:17:58 -0600 Keith Whyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe another, more simple way to ask the question I asked yesterday: > > When my MimeDefang/Spamassassin system tags a message as spam, it adds > > the Spamassassin report as an attachment to the original message. > >

Re: sa-learn maildir

2005-01-01 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 09:26:25 -0600 Rodney Richison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I find all sorts of differant answers when googling for this question. > > I want to sa-learn a folder in my imap. Problem is, I use maildir. > Would something as simple as this do the job? What's the "recommended

Re: sa-learn maildir

2005-01-01 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 09:26:25 -0600 Rodney Richison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I find all sorts of differant answers when googling for this question. > > I want to sa-learn a folder in my imap. Problem is, I use maildir. > Would something as simple as this do the job? What's the "recommended

Re: Solaris compile ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors

2004-11-16 Thread Alex S Moore
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 04:07 +, James Marquez wrote: > Well I seem to have a problem getting Spamassassin 3.0.1 to compile. I am > running Solaris 2.5.1 with Perl 5.8.5 and gcc 3.3.2. I have been able to > install all the required perl modules. Now I want to finally install > Spamassassin and

Re: sa-learn --dump magic returns DB_File errors

2004-10-21 Thread Alex S Moore
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 10:41 -0400, Keith Hackworth wrote: > I figured this out. In case someone else sees this problem, here's the > solution: > > The problem stemmed from DB_File. I tried to recompile DB_File and it > failed during testing. After a little goofing around, I figured out I > need

Re: sa-learn question

2004-10-12 Thread Alex S Moore
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 21:18 -0600, Lance wrote: > Alright, we're running courier IMAP along with pop3 but our spool is all > Maildir format. I've got a public spam folder for certain people so > what would the sa-learn command be? > > sa-learn --spam /var/spool/mail/unixvault.net/shared/.Spam/cur

Re: Bayes R/O tie failed with SA 3.0

2004-10-03 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 21:40 -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:10:56PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > qmailq is the owner of spamd processses and has read/write permission on > bayes_* files through the spam group > > (root)@qmail:/etc/mail/spamassassin# ls -al bayes_* > -rw-rw-r-- 1 ro

Re: Bayes R/O tie failed with SA 3.0

2004-10-02 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 17:01 -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote: > I just upgraded my SA from 2.63 to 3.0. I did the sa-learn --sync after > the upgrade and the restarted spamd. Now I am seeing this error in the > log > > @4000415f15ec35d6286c Cannot open bayes databases > /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_*

Re: Spamassassin 3.0 with mimedefang 2.37

2004-09-29 Thread Alex S Moore
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:52 -0500, Larry Starr wrote: > I am working to upgrade spamassassin, from 2.60 to 3.0, on my RedHat 8 > Mailserver. > > I'm currently running mimedefang 2.37. I have found no references to a > required version of Mimedefang in the docs, and would like to avoid changing

Re: Solaris Gotcha - Re: Quick upgrade review from 2.4x -> 3.0

2004-09-29 Thread Alex S Moore
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:12:48 -0400 (EDT) "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sys-Hostname-Long is majorly broken on Solaris. It assumes a gnu > hostname command and issues 'hostname --fqdn' to get the hostname, > resorting to an IP method if this returns an error. > > hostna

Re: auto learn in 3.0

2004-09-24 Thread Alex S Moore
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 15:17, John Andersen wrote: > It seems to be working here Alex: > ... > Are you sure it was started with autolearn support turned on? > (I think it is the default)... Yes, it is turned on. Normally, learning from

RE: auto learn in 3.0

2004-09-24 Thread Alex S Moore
Since upgrading to 3.0, which is the greatest BTW, I have not had any spam auto-learned. The keywords are correct and running spamassassin with --lint reveals all is ok. Is anyone else seeing this? Alex

Re: SA site?

2004-09-23 Thread Alex S Moore
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 10:57, Chris Santerre wrote: > Is anyone else having trouble getting to the SA website? Not here, Chris. Typing www.spamassassin.org takes me to spamassassin.apache.org quickly. Alex

Re: SA 3.0 bayes db version 2

2004-09-23 Thread Alex S Moore
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 06:01, Thomas Richter wrote: > bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used, aborting! > at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line > 160. > > What to do? Be patient and do not cancel the process? I got the same message and saw that a c

Re: timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input

2004-09-22 Thread Alex S Moore
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 12:17, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > Hrmmm, a good feature in a future version would be the ability to grow > this number dynamically up to some hard-and-fast high limit. This is the way that I am seeing mimedefang-multiplexor work. Have you looked at MIMEDefang? Ale

Re: DCC error and 3.x

2004-09-10 Thread Alex S Moore
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 13:38, Michael Hall wrote: > I just thought I'd try enabling DCC again with 'rc4' and also (still) > get the same error message: > > Sep 10 11:25:57 ukiah dccproc[43025]: missing message body; fatal error > > Has anybody got DCC working with 3.x? Reset my old 2.63 up again a