On 06.04.2006 10:26, Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (06.04.2006/10:17 Uhr) schrieb Alex Broens,
On 06.04.2006 09:52, Michael Monnerie wrote:
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http:
On 06.04.2006 09:52, Michael Monnerie wrote:
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
I always update after new rules are applied, so the use of RulesDuJour
is great
Jamie Pratt wrote:
Evan Platt wrote:
At 12:36 PM 7/14/2005, you wrote:
That's why I am aguing about such a great list setting up to use such
a stupid blocking listing services.
So, here is my point: take my ip 200.207.18.245.
I want someone to *prove* that it is a dsl static IP.
No way
List Mail User wrote:
And adding a URI rule for the completewhois list (basically the same
function as the no longer existing ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org list) will hit
yet more name servers and spammer IPs with slightly fewer FPs (no issue with
escalations). The list is: combined-HIB.dnsi
wolfgang wrote:
In an older episode (Sunday 15 May 2005 12:44), Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
Anyone has a full list of subjects yet, time to do some SA magic... ;)
I have quite a few, here is the subjects list:
Subject: 4,8 Mill. Osteuropaeer durch Fischer-Volmer Erlass
Subject: Auf Streife durc
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Can anyone identify the mail service that generates these authenticated
(login) headers?
Received: from rousalka.dyndns.org (81.64.155.54) by mx.laposte.net
(7.0.028) (authenticated as user.name) id 413489B100C9C1FD for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:43:43 +020
Rose, Bobby wrote:
Wouldn't this just be something that SURBL should take care of? If this
URL is the source of spam then it should be in SURBL regardless if it's
in the zdnet.com domain. Right!?
-Original Message-
From: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just created a rule for the most common spams that have been making it
through SA, but for some reason, it's not showing up in the tests:
body SEE_ATTACH /See attachment message.html/i
describe SEE_ATTACH
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 3:26:35 PM, Alex Broens wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
Brief header I'm not too interested in.
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
http://mysite.verizon.net/resoxfmz/1.htm";>http://pws.prserv.net/ma
Chris Santerre wrote:
Brief header I'm not too interested in.
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
http://mysite.verizon.net/resoxfmz/1.htm";>http://pws.prserv.net/maxlife/EBA.jpg"; width="620"
height="393">
http://mysite.verizon.net/resoxfmz/ServiceBasic.ht
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:22:07PM +0100, Alex Broens wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
I've recently installed SA 3.0.1, and found some junk was
getting through with scores too low for my liking, especially before the
URLs made it into SURBL. I've put together a fe
Chris Santerre wrote:
OK, we know that the popular domains like yahoo.com and such are hard coded
into SA to be skipped on DNSRBL lookups. But it would be great to have a
function to add more locally.
Thinking one step bigger, it would be even better to feed this a file. This
way maybe SURBL can
Matthew Newton wrote:
Hello,
I've recently installed SA 3.0.1, and found some junk was
getting through with scores too low for my liking, especially before the
URLs made it into SURBL. I've put together a few rules to match some
of these that you might find interesting.
They are:
Finally, a string
Daniel Olmedilla wrote:
Dear all,
I am a Ph.D. student that works in Hanover (Germany). I am currently studying
the distribution of spam mails and e-mail addresses. For that I am gathering
some information from e-mail distributions of institutions and also
individuals. I developed a script that
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
I'm getting lots of spam like this. Does anyone know a rule to catch
this type of spam:
Subject: Re:wmcecrgig,HotSt0ck Talk
Message:
I started a stock.cf, but so far the content is vary'ing so much and i
could not find and specific signs so far, so i would also be
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Apache SpamAssassin project is looking to get in touch with large
companies (Fortune 1000) or large user installations (roughly 100,000
users or higher) that are happy using SpamAssassin and might not mind
telling the world that
Chris Santerre wrote:
OK, this isn't the first time we've had this discussion, but Raymond and I
felt this should be made public again. He ran thru some tests of 1500+
domains and found the following data. Looks like they maybe send from
zombies, and never their hosts. IPs are similar across the bo
17 matches
Mail list logo
