Re: can Pyzor run localy?

Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alan Shine wrote:>> Hi,>> I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.>> >> 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the >> message with local repository, not

Re: can Pyzor run localy?

Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alan Shine wrote:>> Hi,>> I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.>> >> 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the >> message with local repository, not

can Pyzor run localy?

Hi, I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.   1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?   2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only SARE rules). We are conside

Some questions regarding SURBL, Pyzor, and DCC

Hi, I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.   1.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only SARE rules). We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor.  My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA, that will result in better spam

Re: Re[2]: very slow performance with SA

AIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Alan,Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 10:59:02 AM, you wrote:AS> Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>>On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:39:14AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>>>I have one spamd - with the default of 5 max children.>>This is likely

Re: very slow performance with SA

Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:40:35AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>> 2. I can't figure out how to turn URIDNSBL off (I couldn't find it > >in the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf). So...how can I turn it off?>Comment out the loadplugi

Re: very slow performance with SA

Alan Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:59:02AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:> > I understand, but allthough I'm running 5 max children ny CPU is between 0-2% idle. > > (I have dual CPU with hyper thread

Re: very slow performance with SA

Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:39:14AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>> >>I have one spamd - with the default of 5 max children.>>>This is likely your problem, if you are truly processing at 16 a sec>then 5 children probably won&

Re: very slow performance with SA

Hi, thanks a lot for your answers, I wrote my responses right after every answer. >jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>It sounds like you are trying to run DNS based rules either without a>DNS or off a test site that does not exist anymore. Some of the BLs that>used to be available are gone. >And you

very slow performance with SA

Hi, I'm new to SA, and currently testing it in order to integrate it with our systems.   The performance appears to be very bad - 6 messages per second.   I'm running SA 3.0.1 on DL380 - dual CPU, hyper thread, 4G RAM, with Redhat 8. spamd is running with the rules engine only, and with most of the

3.0.1 uninitialized value in pattern match - bug or nothing to worry about?

Hi, I'm using SA 3.0.1 via spamd, running on Redhat 8.   some of the mails cause the spamd to write the following message:   use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/pm line 225(sometimes line 179)   is it OK? is everything contin

Peformance problems using spamd

Hi, I'm using spamassassin 2.64, with Mandrake linux 9.2, on Compaq evo (Pentium 4, 2.4Ghz, 512MB Ram).   I'm sending it eml files (from my company's mail DB - in order to find spam saved in the DB), via java program, using spamd(with Bayes DB, no DCC, Pyzor etc. is used)..   -when I have one proce