ipt to get what I needed.
So I guess either both played a part in it, or just one or the other.
Either way, It's working how I want it to. I hope this might solve someone
else's dilemma.
Any additional comments would be helpful to me. Thanks.
-Alan Fullmer
[EMAIL PROT
Thanks. That puts me on the right path.
I did forget to post my script:
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/spamc -f -u "$4" | /usr/sbin/sendmail -i "$@"
exit $?
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:30 PM
To: Ala
I have a question. I'm not sure If it's a setting in Postfix or if
something needs to be set with my wrapper script.
Currently I have Postfix doing virtual lookups by mysql tables. From that
point, I have this:
Master.cf
--
smtp inet n - - -
What would keep SA from looking up entries in the mysql db for some
addresses, then successfully do it to others?
There are certain addresses the system does not want to whitelist because it
isn't looking it up in the database.
But I know it is working because it will pull other addresses out. T
Monnerie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 23-May-06 9:34
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamd memory leak?
On Dienstag, 23. Mai 2006 00:50 Alan Fullmer wrote:
> Mem: 8108656k total, 5907792k used, 2200864k free, 218704k
> buffers Swap: 2031608k total,0
ccasionally it
suggests I run more processes.
The machine is a Dual Core Opteron 64, dual processor with 8 gigs of RAM.
Currently running 64 bit version of Fedora 5.
Anyone have any suggestions with this? OR could this be an issue with the
Kernel?
Thanks in advance.
Alan Fullmer
Zoobuh.com
www.zoobuh.com
/filter/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
It then has several files such as: bayes.lock.mail.domain.com.21886
Is this a sign that a process is not completing? Just curious if anyone
has an idea.
Thanks in advance
Alan Fullmer
www.xnote.com
www.zoobuh.com
resides on the 3rd box and by then it's already 'processed it'.
I'm almost now wondering if there is another issue I may have overlooked.
If you're running that on one machine, makes me wonder. I will investigate
on that part.
-Alan Fullmer
www.xnote.com
www.zoobuh.co
o this? Or are there
suggestions on accomplishing a more balanced load between two machines.
Any comments, helpful hints or suggestions would be more than welcome.
Thanks,
Alan Fullmer
www.xnote.com
www.zoobuh.com
I attempted to do that once, with a
network file system, but it didn’t seem to know how to handle the locking
properly. I know I did something wrong, so if anyone else has a solution,
I’d also be happy to hear it! J
-Alan Fullmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.xnote.com
www.zoobuh.com
ttached are two.
Keep in mind, if I were to forward this mail to myself, it would get
flagged. It just seems to be getting by when they send it.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:53 PM
To: Alan Fullmer
Cc: users@spamassa
tags it as spam the second time.
So I am wondering if spammers have found a way around SA?
I have SA running with Postfix on a linux machine, which then forwards the
filtered mail to an exchange server.
Thanks in advance.
Alan Fullmer
Alan at xnote dot com
www.xnote.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
