How to delete Spam automatically

2006-02-10 Thread Al Bogner
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2.4.21-37.0

Re: More detailed spamanalysis in header

2006-01-29 Thread Al Bogner
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 21:41 schrieb Gary V: > >>/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > >>add_header all Report _REPORT_ > >>ok_languagesde en es fr it pt > >>add_header all Checker‐Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_) on > >>_HOSTNAME_ > >>$sa_spam_report_header = 1; > >>rewrite_subj

Re: More detailed spamanalysis in header

2006-01-29 Thread Al Bogner
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 17:31 schrieb Loren Wilton: > >> add_header all Report _REPORT_ > > > >I use SuSE 9.2 with > > > >g10.suse.de:amavisd-new-2.1.2-5.1 > > Amvis isn't your friend here. It doesn't use the SA headers, it makes its > own. > You'll have to track down the Amvis options to do t

More detailed spamanalysis in header

2006-01-29 Thread Al Bogner
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 03:36 schrieb Chris Purves: > On Sun, January 29, 2006 6:44 am, Al Bogner said: > > The question was: > > What do I have to do to get a more detailed analysis in each header? > add_header all Report _REPORT_ I use SuSE 9.2 with g10.suse.de:ama

My posting bounced as spam

2006-01-28 Thread Al Bogner
You can find my posting here: http://members.inode.at/pinguin/falsepositivespam.txt The question was: What do I have to do to get a more detailed analysis in each header? I am also interested in the spamanalysis of _my_ mail, which you see at the mentioned url. Al

Repository for SuSE 9.2?

2006-01-28 Thread Al Bogner
I would like to use aptitude to install packages and update SuSE 9.2. Which repository do I have to use for spamassassin? At the moment I have: /etc/apt/sources.list rpm ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/ SuSE/9.2-i386 update-prpm security-prpm rpm ftp://mirrors.mathematik.uni-bielefeld.de/p

Re: No X-Spam-Status (sa_tag_level_deflt = -100.0)

2006-01-27 Thread Al Bogner
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 00:52 schrieb Gary V: > The only configurable header field is the X-Virus-Scanned > ($X_HEADER_TAG, $X_HEADER_LINE), other are not configurable, I found a workaround to find out which machine wrote the X-Spam-Status. I use different values for sa_tag_level_deflt Al

Re: No X-Spam-Status (sa_tag_level_deflt = -100.0)

2006-01-26 Thread Al Bogner
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 00:06 schrieb Gary V: > >set > >$mydomain = 'client4.local.FQDN'; > >and add > >@local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain"] ); > > Actually, your domain name is read from /etc/mailname in the > 05-node_id file so you could actually just get rid of it here. > > It would have

Re: No X-Spam-Status (sa_tag_level_deflt = -100.0)

2006-01-26 Thread Al Bogner
Am Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2006 23:40 schrieb Gary V: > Did you ask on the amavis user's list? No, I asked at the german lists Postfixbuch-users, debian and suse. I head no idea, which is the right list to ask. > why would you leave $mydomain blank? I tested a lot, and read there was(?) a bug a

No X-Spam-Status (sa_tag_level_deflt = -100.0)

2006-01-26 Thread Al Bogner
Hi, I asked other mailinglists already and nobody could help me with my problem, since it works sometimes. What I am missing in a mail-header is something like this: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.895 tagged_above=-20 required=5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, (from another system). I have similiar problemes w