ewing pleasure:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/13/us/email-bomb-threats/index.html
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
-Original Message-
From:
I created this a while back. Not sure this is what you want, but it works
with Spamassassin.
http://www.my-webz.net/MyLocalURIBLInstall.html
Gene
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:26 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: HOW to
- Original Message -
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: Lots of spam with the following snip
Justin Mason wrote:
[snip]
On 01.07.08 10:50, Justin Mason wrote:
no -- this is real spam, not a bounce in any way.
same here. not
I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
does not get labeled spam. If you send out via a client with smtp, it
labels 9
If you disable the bayes mySQL database you will break amavisd-maia.
Either use amavisd-maia or amavisd-new with either flat files or mySQL.
Salvatore wrote:
> "Lina, Patrick" wrote:
>> At least these must be configured:
>> use_bayes 1
>> bayes_path /var/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes
>>
>> All the
It is not all that unusual to see differences in SA when run from the
command line. Have you looked at what scores are being hit on the
actual incoming message (amavisd-new log level to 2)?
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:12 -0500, Craig Carriere wrote:
I use 2
A rough guess and probably wrong as usual, but could the message size be
larger than what you have set in amavisd-new? If so then SA would be
bypassed but not when you manually test the message.
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> We use SA 3.1.7 with Postfix and amavisd-new 2.4.4 and clamav. I
> recei
Jonathan and all:
First off sorry for the problem and to any from the country of Poland
that were offended by this. The response came from our ISP which we
fetch our mail from; they run a anti-spamming service that we are
suppose to be opted out off but apparently are not. One of its many
"f
When we ran 3.1.8 our mail server processors reported average 25%
activity. But after upgrading spamassassin to 3.2.0 and then 3.2.1, the
servers were running nearly 100% of capacity and folks are complaining
about mail delays. The volume of incoming mail is about constant. We've
backed off to
On 01/12/06, Terry Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can't find a spamd.sh anywhere...
Hi again,
It's most likely a StartupItem.
Hi Terry,
If it is, it's not in /Library/StartupItems/ or /System/Library/StartupItems/...
Bye for now, Terry Allen
___
I can't find a spamd.sh anywhere...
Hi,
I've just updated SpamAssassin 3.0.2 using cpan (under Mac OS X Server
10.3.9, perl 5.8.1), and despite telling it to use various current
mirrors listed on the SpamAssassin site yesterday, it's only updating
to 3.0.4.
I'm reasonably new at this; is there something obvious I'm missing?
Shouldn
12 matches
Mail list logo
