retty good.
Regards,
David.
---
We use it here; I've got a little python script that parses out recent entries
from that project and builds a simple postfix static map to block mail attempts
to them. I'm happy to share if anyone's interested.
- Aaron Bennett
Manage
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:t...@ipinc.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:20 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: preventing authenticated smtp users from triggering PBL
>
> why are you using authenticated SMTP from trusted networks?
>
> T
> -Original Message-
>
> Based on the headers you included, there's nothing indicating the sender
> was authenticated. Are you using the following in postfix?
>
> smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header yes
No, I'm not -- that's a good idea. If I turn that on, can I write a rule bas
thenticated SMTP/TLS through the 'cmail' host, how can I prevent it from
hitting the PBL?
Thanks,
Aaron
---
Aaron Bennett
Manager of Systems Administration
Clark University ITS
On 06/29/2010 11:00 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Aaron Bennett wrote:
1) Are you supposed to have a global Bayes DB?
2) How many users do you have?
3) If the answer to 1) is "yes", did you set bayes_sql_override_username?
If the answer to 1) is no, you're probably not running B
I'm sort of pulling at straws here, but I'm reading the manpage for
sa-learn and it says that sa-learn will try to expire bayes tokens
according to this:
- the number of tokens in the DB is> 100,000
- the number of tokens in the DB is> bayes_expiry_max_db_size
- there is
suggestion about raising the RCVD_IN_PBL
score? I was thinking of raising it as high as 2 or 3. Another thing
I'm considering is a META rule that scores for PBL + BAYES_60, etc.
I am generally reluctant to mess much with the default scoring -- but
I'm always looking for a better se
k. I'm getting this error when I run with
debugging:
[20790] dbg: dns: query failed:
4.2.3.72_sare_bml_post25x.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net => NOERROR
Thanks for any suggestions
- Aaron Bennett
Here's the complete output of the sa-update:
[EMAIL PR
x27;m glad to have a confirmation that 0.1 is
obviously not enough but I'm curious how others are scoring these rules;
given a general spam target of 5. I'm thinking of scoring in the range
of 1.5 - 2...
Best,
Aaron Bennett
ault
scores, or have you tweaked them at all?
Best,
Aaron Bennett
listmail wrote:
I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the
check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems to have
removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not reduce the database size.
If you are using MySQL with the Innodb backend
11 matches
Mail list logo
