> On 05.11.08 12:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Swinog has no listing for this url - so why does spamassassin mark this
>> mail?
>
> Don't post message body to the list. put whole message (including all
> headers) somewhere so we can look at it.
> --
>From [
Hello,
Swinog has no listing for this url - so why does spamassassin mark this mail?
thx
Sebastian
**
Hallo!
Du erhältst diese E-Mail, weil du über Antworten zum Thema "Plugin wie
wpseo ?" auf
Serendipity [s9y] Forums benachrichtigt werden wolltest. Dieses Thema h
Find out why this revolutionary has the radio airwaves buzzing. get all the
info about what it is, how it works, and how you can become a part of it. The
radio interveiw last 20 minutes. This will be the best 20 minutes of your life.
Act now and don't miss out on a wonderful opportunity. For mor
We have been getting more and more of the soft porn followed by www
somesite dot com
If you change the url to www.somesite.com surbl catches it.
Any ideas?
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 03:35 +0200, Hendrik Helmvoigt wrote:
> This night it seems like we're beeing spammed again by xml documents,
> but this time neatly packed into a zipfile:
>
> I'm really excited whats going to happen next. Maybe psd files embedded
> in pdf and then rar'ed.
>
> And i'd sti
Hi,
I think you should find out why your databse is getting corrupted and
not trying to fix a bypass with spamd.
Your mysql database should not get corrupted.
Regards
Cedric
Marc Perkel wrote:
Every now and then my MySQL databased seems to be getting corrupted.
What seems to be happening is
Hi,
The same problem happen if you try to have amavis database replicated on
multiple mysql server.
It would be nice to have a way around this and also a way to configure a
fail over mysql server.
Regards
Cedric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think i ran into the same problem. try a direct
Evan Platt wrote:
At 01:28 PM 2/2/2007, Mr. Delphi Developer wrote:
SpamAssassin v3.1.7
I would like to know how to either use Regex on a subject line
or to ban an IP range.
Possible?? If not, why not? These would be great features...
SpamAssassin doesn't 'ban'. Spamassassin is a filter. It
Hi all,
I was wondering if it was possible to run spamassassin from a PHP script?
So it can be used to check the contents of a text string or plain text
file, and score it the same as it would score an email.
Thanks
Pete
HI all,
I have been running sendmail dual mta+amavis+spamassassin+milter-spiff,
also on every stmp there is a access-list that permit only working
address to be accepted.
This setup as been working fine on 5 servers for a while now each
servers blocking a average of 300K connections per days
John
The blacklist.cf has been superseded long ago by the URI-RBLs..
Also what version of Spamassassin are you using???
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Sujit Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 January 2007 10:38
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Increase in unmarked spam
>
> Recently (for the last two weeks), we are seeing lot of unmarked spam.
> Lot
Thanks.
I've found a possible answer.
Spamassassin works with only 1 child.
Now I have add another child, 2.
And now all my mails have the header.
Is possible that spamassassin couldn't process all mails because has
only one child... so I have some mails with no header and much spam???
sorr
Hello,
I'm newbie...
I have a debian server with qmail e spamassassin 3.1.4
I've a lot of spam.
I begin with only one question: how can I add in the header of my
mail the result of scan also if the message is clean?
Now spamassassin add header only if the mail is a spam mail.
I need to read als
Hi,
> gpg --armor
--export KEYID
>
> the man page is amazingly helpful ;-)
Thanks, that was helpful. The instructions have been updated to use
this technique instead of copying the entire public key ring of root.
cheers,
skar.
--
OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter
http://openprotec
Hi,
> Any chance
of adding support for 3.1.5? (Currently fails with "dns:
> query failed: 5.1.3.saupdates.openprotect.com
=> NXDOMAIN".)
We've already added txt record for the 3.1.5 release and it should
work now.
cheers,
skar.
--
OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter
http://openpr
Hi everyone,
I have a little problem :
As you can see below, this message is scoring : 25.1 pts, but instead i
see 10,00 points.
How to i set spamassassin to have stronger limit or the score ?
Content analysis details: (10,00 points, 6,00 required)
pts rule name description
-
Hallo,
and sorry for my bad english.
I've a server debian with qmail and vpopmail.
I use spamassassin to mark the spam mail.
I invoke spamc from .qmail-default in every domain folder.
This is the line I add to .qmail-default:
/ussr/bin/spamc -f -t 20
Now,
I want only for one subdomain that spa
Justin Mason wrote:
hey, btw, it might be better to extract the gpg public key from "gpg",
instead of copying over the entire public key ring -- since that will (a)
overwrite any existing SA-update keys, including the system ones,
and (b) will trust any existing GPG correspondents to publish SA
Hi,
This is to notify you about another SARE channel with the most used
rules available as a single channel. If you're not the type to try
every single rule in SARE and manually select them, you can instead use
this single channel instead.
OpenProtect's Sa-update channel for SARE
Sa-update,
Hi
I'm using spamassassin + qmail-scanner
There is a way to tell qmail-scanner or spamassasin to NOT delivery mail
if spamc failed?
This is beecause sometimes my spamd daemon goes down and all spam
messages are passed...
Any ideas?
Sometimes i get this errors from spamd:
Aug 23 08:48:15 dmz spamd[24977]: syslog() failed: corrupted regexp
program at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i586-linux-thread-multi/S
ys/Syslog.pm line 320.
Aug 23 08:48:16 dmz spamd[24977]: razor2 check skipped: corrupted
regexp program at /usr/lib/perl5/site_pe
Hi list,
I'm using spamassassin with qmail-rocks + qmai-scanner + clamav and I'm
having >too many< cases with messages classified with SA:0(?/?)
I read the FAQ and there I get this explanation:
>>> Why do some messages get tagged with "SA:0(?/?)" instead of
numbers?.
>>> SpamAssassins "spam
Have you been able to configure cPanel spam assassin to include the spam
as inline text instead of an email attachment?
Regards
--
AntiSpamConsult(TM)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for not replying to all, forgot.
Thank you for the help! Someday ill remember it!
on 5/12/06 8:53 AM, Steven Stern at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Doh, no...can you point me in the direction of how to do that?
>>
>>
>>
>> on
Ok, fair enough...i downloaded and ran
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz
As descibed on the site. I don't see any changes in the version number, is
there more I have to do ?
on 5/11/06 12:41 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Help Guy wrote:
Thank you Theo!
I will put it online and sleep somewhat better tonight. :)
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different
from what I remember. In short, it
. Thank you in advance for any insight. - John Winters
*** This is a non spam message with Spam stuff at top.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on as3.allspeed.us
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=9.0 tests=AWL,BA
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone running Windows and SA has tried the new
ActivePerl with 3.1.1?
This isnt backscatter though. The only message body is the spam, no info
about bouncing at all. Im familiar with the backscatter as my users:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really gets a ton of it (duh).
This is just spam coming in from nobody with 2 from lines and a body that is
pure junk, not mailer
=MTA,
relay=pool-151-197-121-196.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.121.196]
These messages turn out to be like this:
>From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Jan 5 16:36:46 2006
From: Mable Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPAM (29.3)] Re: hi hi
As you can see, spamassassin tak
Hello all, and happy Friday!
I woke up this morning to spam in my box! Seems spamd wasn't working
properly:
Dec 9 05:56:13 mail spamd[26498]: prefork: syswrite(8) failed, retrying...
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line
554.
What happened?
lowered
the children to 5, and my problem has gone away. I guess I will just ignore
the maillog warning about children and let it do its job like it should!
on 12/6/05 6:16 PM, JamesDR at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So a few times a day I end up having to stop my
So a few times a day I end up having to stop my sendmail on my linux mail
server. Here is the back story. I was running 2.64, with procmail and
recently upgraded to 3.1. I started the 3.1 with
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m10
Which works great, but I think the old spamassassin is still running because
Where do I adjust this?
on 12/5/05 3:22 PM, Matt Kettler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bayes_expiry_max_db_size
Hey guys, the bayes_toks and bayes_seen files for my users are pretty
bloated and beginning to effect my diskspace. Is there anything I can do ?
Just nuke them and start over? can I put a limit on them?
I might add that im not totally opposed to dumping bayes info and starting
fresh...would that be an easier solution?
on 10/31/05 1:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Did that, didn't help though. I only have the one version
Did that, didn't help though. I only have the one version of sa-learn.
on 10/31/05 1:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I finally upgraded from 2.64 to 3.01 using CPAN.
> ...
>> I ran sa-learn --sync
> ...
>> Howe
Hello all:
I finally upgraded from 2.64 to 3.01 using CPAN. I ready the UPGRADE file,
of course. I made the tweaks of the necessary items using CPAN and my local
conf file.
I ran sa-learn --sync and after removing some old .cf files (like spamcop) I
got it to run clean. However, I still have t
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:16:26 +0200, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At 08:49 PM 7/5/2005, Bjoern Olausson wrote:
Qmail-scanner-queu semms not to submitt the -u flag to spamd. So if I
run spamd with the "-v -u vpopmail" option I get the following error:
check your
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:16:26 +0200, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At 08:49 PM 7/5/2005, Bjoern Olausson wrote:
Qmail-scanner-queu semms not to submitt the -u flag to spamd. So if I
run spamd with the "-v -u vpopmail" option I get the following error:
check your
This means that the server you are sending through: americanadvisor.net is
listed. If that's your sever then contact the blacklist, if it is someone
you pay, contact them!
> From: ChupaCabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:50:18 -0600
> To: users@spa
my $module ($instmod->modules()) {
my $version = $instmod->version($module) || "???";
print "$module -- $version\n";
}
###
Output example:
Mail::SpamAssassin -- 3.02
Net::DNS -- 0.48
Perl -- 5.6.1
Test::Harness -- 2.46
Test::Simple --
Dear list
How can I tell to spamassassin that is not a spam? I'm using qmail .
What 's spamassassin command, by e-mail, to cancel a supposed spam (not
to learn) - a user control wihitelist.
Thanks
Flavio
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" (perhaps you forgot to load
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus"?) at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 231.
All packages came from official woody repository. But woody
spamassassin package contains PerMsgSatatus!
Thanks
Matt Kettler escreveu:
At 09:11
Hi ALL
I installed a debian woody qmail server using qmailrocks how-to but my
spamassassin is out of work. I'm using apt-get to install it, but I
receive many erros like that. How can I solve it
I receive this errors from a spamassassin standard spam test.
Failed to run LINES_OF_YELLING SpamAssa
Put your rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin
they wont get written over
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:57:30 -0600
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: newbie question about adding rules
>
> I am looking at adding some rule
anyone good with sendmail/blacklists, I need some off list advice please...
thanks
Brilliant! Nice reference.
> From: Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:33 -0500
> To: SURBL Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: RE: Flyer for MIT spam conference?
>
>
>
>> -Original Mess
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:32:59 -0600
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: spamcop question
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:17 A
Anyone else having issues with the fact that spamcop has many of Yahoo's
bulk servers listed. These servers handle their mailling lists and groups
accounts. This is more a blacklist question, but is there anyway to
whitelist IP's that are in blacklists?
Add
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.00
in your local.cf file
> From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd
> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:38:12 +0100
> To: "'spam'"
> Sub
As Usual, you're all quite helpful! Thank you!
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:52:36 -0400
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: spam slippin through
>
> At 12:25 PM 10/12/2004, [EMAIL PR
running a site wide SA 2.6 setup, some XXX html only mails are impossible to
stop, getting scores as low as 2.0
the email just calls images, and thats about it. should i paste the subject
here, they are quite distinct, and im sure others are getting them.
Watching the maillogs with SA 2.6 each call of spamd comes with this:
Oct 12 09:47:24 mail spamd[15997]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at port 51225
and the following call the port increments upward. What is this?
Thanks to all who helped get my logging going!
Here is what actually logs in the maillog:
Oct 11 09:18:13 mail spamd[22851]: info: setuid to myuser succeeded
Oct 11 09:18:13 mail spamd[22851]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for myuser:1661.
Oct 11 09:18:17 mail spamd[22851]: iden
Thanks guys, problem was i commented out the old stuff:
#:0fw
#| /usr/bin/spamassasin
#:0
when i needed to leave the second :0 uncommentedd'oh!
thanks again
> From: Morris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "[EMAIL PROT
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc
it doesnt do that anymore. Is there a way to route it back to the
/user/spam?
> From: Morris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Matt Kettl
Thank you Matt!
You're info is great, but I'm sure you dont mind if I take your disclaimer
seriously.
Before I go on, anyone that uses spamd confirm this info...?
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:48:40 -0400
> To: "[EMAIL
rom: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:03:59 -0400
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: SA logging
>
> At 12:55 PM 10/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Im sure SA should be logging something to somewher
Hey all:
running SA 2.6 on Linux with Sendmail.
Im sure SA should be logging something to somewhere, probably maillog right?
Well I dont have anything in the maillog from SA. Am I missing something?
Anyone help me debug why it's not logging?
Agreed, comcast.net's mail servers were in sorbs big list...our customers
didnt like that!
it might be helpful to know in what capacity the servers are working
in...ISPs, corporate, private?
> From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:18:21
spamcop.net
njabl.org
spamhaus.org
ordb.org
recently took a lot of heat for using sorbs.net
RE: Preferred DNSBL
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
not an absolute path
Now it would seem that perhaps it's trying to make a user folder for the
user "x". I cant find anyone sending to this user, ever. Is there
somewhere that this message to "x" is queued up? It's very odd.
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hey all, posed this question a week ago, never got an answer, so Im trying
again. Redhat and Sendmail and the procmail get this occasionally:
mkdir .: Permission denied at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 825
procmail: Program failure (70) of "/usr/bin/spamassassin"
proc
Hello all. Ive been lurking for a week or two hoping to learn something,
but I think my starting knowledge is too far behind!
I have a Redhat server running sendmail 8.12 that can pre-installed with
spamassassin. Ive never used spamassassin before, and Im a sysadmin who
going by the trial by fir
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:39:02 -0400
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: New User, Errors
>
> At 10:34 AM 9/7/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> mkdir .: Permission denied at
>> /u
Hi all:
I too am brand new to SA, and I'm looking for a how to type of site. I
found that starting SA up with the threshold of 5 was way to tight for my
ISP mail server running Sendmail. I have had to push it up to 12 till I can
figure out how to modify or turn off the default rule sets. Anyone
68 matches
Mail list logo
