Nick Howitt writes:
>> Has SA doctrine changed in terms of default ruleset inclusion of RBLs
>> that block small sites with properly-configured resolvers? I managed
>> to miss the new feature of detecting blockage and disabling that RBL,
>> and I can see that with that feature, having default r
On 19/11/2024 13:53, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matija Nalis writes:
Fromhttps://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
:
Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
anonymous users over a 30-day period.
10k requests per 30-da
Matija Nalis writes:
> From
> https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS
> :
>
>> Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to
>> anonymous users over a 30-day period.
>
> 10k requests per 30-day period is about 333 queries
On 19/11/2024 10:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
The point of the big ugly error message is to have a big ugly error
message. MOST people who report problems with SA accuracy here have
misconfigured their resolvers, apparently because they don't trust
documentation or don't read it.
Not
On 18 Nov 2024, Bill Cole spake thusly:
If you forward DNS queries instead of running your own *fully
recursive* DNS resolver locally, you *look* like you are part of a
high-volume leech. This almost certainly does not mean you should run
dnsmasq locally, it means you need a REAL resolver. Unboun
