So this is a bug in amavis and not spamassassin? Or is it in the DMARC.pm
plugin? https://metacpan.org/pod/Mail::DMARC?
Hm, there might be different opinions on this. I would ask Mail::DMARC developers if they could apply their invalid-to-permerror
mapping for all codepaths in Mail::DMARC::dki
I am somewhat certain those two lines are related and that the "invalid DKIM
result" is `invalid` verbatim.
Mail::DKIM::Verifier creates a signature with a result `invalid` for ed25519, Amavis passes all signatures to SpamAssassin,
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DMARC->_check_dmarc invokes Mail::D
On 17/11/2024 11:39, Damian wrote:
I am somewhat certain those two lines are related and that the
"invalid DKIM result" is `invalid` verbatim.
Mail::DKIM::Verifier creates a signature with a result `invalid` for
ed25519, Amavis passes all signatures to SpamAssassin,
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plu
On 17/11/2024 11:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
My set up is Debian 12 with their packaged amavis, postfix,
spamassassin, clamav and postfix-policyd-spf-python.
On 17.11.24 09:
2024-11-17T09:12:32.176335+00:00 mail-www amavis[2068017]: (2068017-11) dkim: FAILED
Author+Sender+MailFrom signature by d=community.ipfire.org, From:
, a=ed25519-sha256, c=relaxed/relaxed,
s=202003ed25519, i=@community.ipfire.org,
m.list(ml:static/dynamic-routing.networking.community.ipfire.
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
My set up is Debian 12 with their packaged amavis, postfix,
spamassassin, clamav and postfix-policyd-spf-python.
On 17.11.24 09:46, Nick Howitt wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Spamassa
On 16/11/2024 23:12, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2024-11-16 at 16:48:49 UTC-0500 (Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:48:49 +)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I am just going through my mail logs and I am seeing a lot of:
_WARN: plugin: eval failed: invalid DKIM result at
/usr/share/
