Xavier Humbert skrev den 2024-09-27 13:20:
To: r...@groumpf.org
From: root
I don't understand while it is not whitelisted.
is internal_networks + trusted_networks set in local.cf ?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
if its local mail root@ root@ you should see ALL_TRUSTED hits
avoid whiteli
On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 19:57, Alex wrote:
>
> FMBLA now also appears to be part of DNSWL.
>
Please note that dkimwl.org (and the associated fresh.fmb.la) are not
associated with dnswl.org, despite the similarity in name.
The dkimwl.org/fmb.la nameservers obey the free usage limits and standard
[abbrieviated version, as gmail rejected my first attempt]
Hi,I've been following this thread on allowable query limits and have a few
questions. While I don't see any DKIMWL_BLOCKED or other *_BLOCKED rules
hitting in my logs, I am seeing timeouts related to their sub-rules like
this:
Sep 26 12:
Le 27/09/2024 13:20, Xavier Humbert a écrit :
Surprisingly, while I have in whitelist.cf this line :
whitelist_from r...@aragorn.groupf.org
Oh ! Just reading this I saw a typo in the address.
Just waiting until tomorrow for the next report
Regards,
Xavier
--
Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/Ma
Hi,
Surprisingly, while I have in whitelist.cf this line :
whitelist_from r...@aragorn.groupf.org
my postfix reports are marked as spam (many spammy URIs, this is expected)
You can see part of the headers :
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 6.729
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=
On 26.09.24 10:27, joe a wrote:
Maybe I should not ask this, but . . .
A relatively innocuous member informational email from a local town Library
(monthly) gets marked as spam as shown below.
The BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 values are something I am toying with for other
reasons. Seems odd these
> ---
>If guns kill people, then...
> -- pencils miss spel words.
> -- cars make people drive drunk.
> -- spoons make people fat.
> ---
:) I wa
>
> > So, on the one hand I can add them to whitelist and be done with it, or
> > I can add them to missed HAM for re-learning.
> >
> > Which is the best approach?
>
> Do both.
>
You will be always having work. The one's SPAM is the other users delight. I
have switched to having frontend serve
