Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

2024-09-25 Thread Peter
On 26/09/24 01:20, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Root Cause Analysis (in order): 1) DNSWL does not provide blocked codes.  That deviates from most DNS-query based systems. On 24.09.24 20:43, Matthias Leisi wrote: This is wrong. I have checked with 1.1.1.1, where queries only return 127.0.1

Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3

2024-09-25 Thread Grega via users
Oh god I`m idiot... I had: score BAYES_20 0.0 So now every mail has bayes score in it (changed it to score BAYES_20 0.1) Still puzzling why I have no extreme low or extreme high values. Also still puzzling why out of 3 identical mails one had bayes_60 and other 2 bayes_20. Autolearn is o

Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3

2024-09-25 Thread Grega via users
Hi. Im on mysql backend. Load is none .. From: Matija Nalis Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 18:24 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote: > Why one has "BAYES_6

Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3

2024-09-25 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:10:38AM +, Grega via users wrote: > Also this: > > RuleDescriptionScoreTotalHamCol6SpamCol8 > BAYES_40Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%0.002,784 > 2,72197.7632.3 > BAYES_50Bayes spam probability is 40 to 6

Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3

2024-09-25 Thread Matija Nalis
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote: > Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not? > > 4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder) What backend are you using for storing bayer data? I'm not yet on 4.x (Debian Stable FTW), but in SA 3.x default was a local file storage (BDB?

Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

2024-09-25 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Greg Troxel wrote on 26/09/24 12:13 am: It looks to me like there may be a middle ground that works for both SA and dnswl. Your suggestions are in a similar direction to discussions that have been moved over to the dev list as they have become more relevant to that mailing list. Our first te

Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

2024-09-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Root Cause Analysis (in order): 1) DNSWL does not provide blocked codes. That deviates from most DNS-query based systems. On 24.09.24 20:43, Matthias Leisi wrote: This is wrong. I have checked with 1.1.1.1, where queries only return 127.0.10.3 It would help SA (and perhaps also DNSWL) if

Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

2024-09-25 Thread Greg Troxel
Sidney Markowitz writes: > The third is the correct return code to indicate blocking for > overuse. When SpamAssassin sees that, it hits a rule whose description > is supposed to inform whoever looks at the mail headers or spam report > that the ISP has misconfigured their SpamAssassin server's D

Wild hair

2024-09-25 Thread jdow
I've been running SpamAssassin for longer than seems realistic (2.28 with 1998 Red Hat Hurricane?). Anyway I have started moving everything mail to yet a new machine, Ubunto LTS 24.04.01. That only supports SA 4.0.0. I've been contemplating the pain of sideloading 4.0.1 into the system. Then I n

Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

2024-09-25 Thread Jared Hall via users
On 9/24/2024 2:43 PM, Matthias Leisi wrote: Root Cause Analysis (in order): 1) DNSWL does not provide blocked codes.  That deviates from most DNS-query based systems. This is wrong. — Matthias Yes, I am wrong.  I *presumed* certain operational characteristics. The 127.0.10.3 response