> On Jul 22, 2020, at 23:56, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> However, I have questions of adoption rate, impersonation concerns,
>> anticompetitive concerns, and privacy concerns. This just sounds like a
>> commercial tracking pixel but the dev
Hi!
Loads of phishing is done that way.
Having a shtml with a post command to whatever they want from you… usually
banking/dhl …
With kind regards,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> Op 12 mrt 2024 om 20:37 heeft Jared Hall via users
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Is there a use case for emailing .shtm
On 3/12/2024 4:04 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37:
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
i have seen .html attachment
only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin
might be same
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-03-12 20:37:
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
i have seen .html attachment
only reason i think its tryed was to skip url testing in spamassassin
might be same for shtml
i still have the clamav rule to re
Is there a use case for emailing .shtml files, or can these just be
simply discarded?
Thanks,
-- Jared Hall