I don't have the specifics at hand but I created a rule that places a
heavy score (like 2.0) on anything that matches existing sex and bitcoin
rules. These messages usually match a bunch of other signals and that
rule pushes the score over my delete-on-sight threshold (8.0).
On 2023-11-10 05:5
To block this type of spam I've increased the score of GB_HASHBL_BTC (Bitcoin
rbl) rule.
Giovanni
On 11/10/23 11:01, Mark London wrote:
Sendmail didn't introduce FEATURE(require_rdns) until 2007. I'm sure I've been
using it longer than that. And by default it's not enabled.
It doesn't tota
Sendmail didn't introduce FEATURE(require_rdns) until 2007. I'm sure
I've been using it longer than that. And by default it's not enabled.
It doesn't totally block the "I RECOVERED YOU" spams. Occasional some
come through with ip addresses that have valid reverse lookups. But the
number g
Yes that is fucked up that experience and wisdom comes with getting older ;)
https://faculty.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/require_rdns.m4
>
> Marc - You are correct. All the IP sources of this spam, don't a valid
> reverse lookup of the IP address, to an IP name. That will solve my
> problem.
