That page had it all wrong from the beginning. Adjusting priority only for
subrules but not the metas (yes metas don't use priorities in 4.0 but
relative priorities are still adjusted for backwards compatibility,
__CLAMAV* end up as priority 0 like everything else).
The logical way to handle th
The X-Spam-Virus could be absent from the email header.
You can consider adding the following line:
add_header spam Virus _VIRUSRESULT_
If this doesn't work, the ClamAV plugin might need to include
"put_metadata('X-Spam-Virus')" when it detects a virus.
Jimmy
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:06 AM An
Hello,
We're using clam, some extra signatures, and the plugin/config as described
on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/ClamAVMultipleScores
to give different signature families different scores.
Since moving to v4, I don't think it's working...
The only rule that is match
"Reindl Harald (privat)" writes:
>>> We really would need a lot more context to answer that.
>> Using scripts that hide things has his problems. :-(
>> The script was using:
>> sa-update
>> And when I run that from the command line I get:
>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>> What platform are you running on? (OS, distro, perl version, etc.)
>>
>>Debian 12.
>>sa-update version 4.0.0 / svn1900642
>> running on Perl version 5.36.0
>
> Debian 12 contains SpamAssassion 4.0.0-6.
Strange. When running 'apt update' I get:
All packages
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote on 2/11/23 4:02 am:
>> And when I run that from the command line I get:
>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>> '/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
>
> That is referring to the owner of the directory
Argh, you are right. To many hours
