Re: Correct way to allowlist an IP from DNSBL checks when it's not the final Received?

On 9/27/23 2:15 PM, Andy Smith wrote: Hi, Hi, The IP address of a supplier is currently listed by Spamhaus SBL-CSS. Oops. How would I go about allowlisting this IP address against DNSBL hits? Ideally for a specified range of from addresses and/or envelope senders, but for every sender if

Re: Correct way to allowlist an IP from DNSBL checks when it's not the final Received?

On 9/28/2023 8:39 AM, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 06:48:54AM -0400, Jared Hall wrote: Do you mind if I redirect the below back onto the spamassassin list and respond to it there? Well I was going to do that, but fair enough! On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:02:47AM -0400, Jare

Re: DMARC and SA4

On 27/09/2023 12:31, Bill Cole wrote: Quarantine is a silly concept. Users hate it in practice. Citation please? My experiences over the many years differ SpamAssassin does not implement any form of quarantine. This is not because it's a bad idea, but because SA doesn't implement ANY handli

Re: Correct way to allowlist an IP from DNSBL checks when it's not the final Received?

Hello, On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 06:48:54AM -0400, Jared Hall wrote: > Do you mind if I redirect the below back onto the spamassassin list > and respond to it there? Well I was going to do that, but fair enough! > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:02:47AM -0400, Jared Hall wrote: > > SpamAssassin doesn't

Re: Correct way to allowlist an IP from DNSBL checks when it's not the final Received?

Hi Jared, Do you mind if I redirect the below back onto the spamassassin list and respond to it there? I'm concerned that I might have a configuration error if a DNSBL check was done against an IP from a Received header that wasn't the last external one, as you mention. Thanks, Andy On Thu,