Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Damn. Was hoping that wasn't the case. Can we get a bug open? On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 11:47 Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > On 2022-11-28 at 11:03:29 UTC-0500 (Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:03:29 -0500) > Alex > is rumored to have said: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:42 AM

Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-11-28 at 11:03:29 UTC-0500 (Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:03:29 -0500) Alex is rumored to have said: On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:42 AM Kevin A. McGrail wrote: [...] Also, would be helpful to know if this is different than 3.4.6's behavior. Oh yes, I meant to mention that it is different be

Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Alex
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:42 AM Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > What's the score on that short circuit Validity rule? > -2.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE RBL: Sender in Validity Safe - Contact certificat...@validity.com [Return Path SenderScore Safe L

Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
What's the score on that short circuit Validity rule? I think the expectation is that it's a -100 type rule but I could be wrong. Did you confirm with -D that the behavior is as you describe and more rules kept running after the short circuit? I don't use the short circuit. Also, would be helpf

Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Alex
Hi, > Well, a short circuit rule kind of breaks things in the middle so I do not > think you should really spend too much time on rules that hit/didn't hit. > > I like validity but I don't think it justifies a short circuit, FYI. > Okay, it's been removed, but somehow the presence of that didn't

Re: ToCc Header operations

2022-11-28 Thread Henrik K
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 08:31:41AM -0500, Jared Hall wrote: > SA: 3.4.6 > > The Header ToCc test doesn't seem to accept :name and :addr modifiers. > > Is that how this function operates? It should accept it just fine. But in 3.4 :addr or :name can only return results of first email. So it make

Re: ToCc Header operations

2022-11-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I don't really know. Is there an example rule and I'll check the code. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 8:32 AM Jared Hall wrote: > SA: 3.4.6 > > The Hea

Re: Mial hits MISSING rules despite presence of headers

2022-11-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Well, a short circuit rule kind of breaks things in the middle so I do not think you should really spend too much time on rules that hit/didn't hit. I like validity but I don't think it justifies a short circuit, FYI. Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeri