Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference between enable dkim in
amavisd-new and having it set to 0 letting spamassassin just do its thing
with loadmodule dkim?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:26 AM Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 12:57:32PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> >
> >
> > Amavisd-
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 12:57:32PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>
>
> Amavisd-new works fine here. Maybe $enable_dkim_verification or something
> is different.
>
>
> It's good to know you're using amavisd. It's very dependent upon the SA
> version
> you're using, though.
>
> It appears both DKI
>
> Amavisd-new works fine here. Maybe $enable_dkim_verification or something
> is different.
>
It's good to know you're using amavisd. It's very dependent upon the SA
version you're using, though.
It appears both DKIM and DMARC worked until the May 29th version from svn
(1901385).
At some point
Amavisd-new works fine here. Maybe $enable_dkim_verification or something is
different.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 03:32:14PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
> All the people that reported DKIM failures to me in SA 4.0 in the last month
> are using amavisd-new, could it be related to how amavisd
All the people that reported DKIM failures to me in SA 4.0 in the last month
are using amavisd-new, could it be related to how amavisd-new is calling SA ?
Giovanni
On 6/26/22 07:55, Henrik K wrote:
>
> Have you checked what debugging says?
>
> $sa_debug = 'info,dkim,DMARC';
>
>
> On Sat, Jun
