>
>
>
> >> did you reload/restart amavis after installing new SA?
> >> This header is added by amavis which uses SA libraries internally.
>
> On 30.05.22 09:50, Alex wrote:
> >Yes, thanks. This has been ongoing for weeks.
>
> doesn't amavisd by any chance use old SA installation/libraries?
>
I don
On 2022-05-30 at 06:22:39 UTC-0400 (Mon, 30 May 2022 22:22:39 +1200)
DL Neil
is rumored to have said:
On 30/05/2022 03.06, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2022-05-28 at 19:25:46 UTC-0400 (Sun, 29 May 2022 11:25:46 +1200)
DL Neil
is rumored to have said:
No, he said it.
SpamAssassin x86_64 3.4.0 Cent
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.383 tagged_above=-200 required=5
>tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DCC_REPUT_00_12=-0.4, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
>DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DMARC_REJECT=0.1,
>FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25,
>HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.
>
> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.383 tagged_above=-200 required=5
> >tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DCC_REPUT_00_12=-0.4, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
> >DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DMARC_REJECT=0.1,
> >FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25,
> >HTML_IMAGE_
On 30/05/2022 03.06, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-05-28 at 19:25:46 UTC-0400 (Sun, 29 May 2022 11:25:46 +1200)
> DL Neil
> is rumored to have said:
No, he said it.
>> SpamAssassin x86_64 3.4.0 CentOS 6.el7 release
>> Postfix 2.10.1
>> unbound 1.6.6
>
> Obsolete antiques all...
May be so, but so
We have been DMARC issues so no, it is not you Are you running the latest
trunk right now? There have been a flurry of patches and some of them are
for this issue.
On 29.05.22 12:41, Alex wrote:
Yes, just downloaded, compiled, and installed the latest as of this moment
and still seeing the s
