On 7/4/22 11:05 pm, Bill Cole wrote:
2. There appears to be a spurious blank line before the From: line,
which logically breaks the header block, so the lines after that are
technically not headers. This MAY be an artifact of how you copied the
headers into your message rather than something i
On 2022-04-07 at 03:19:34 UTC-0400 (Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:19:34 +0800)
Jeremy Ardley
is rumored to have said:
> Off topic, I'm now running postcreen on the mail servers. Is that an
> efficient way to limit spammers? Would I get better results if I greylisted
> as well as postscreen? Or instead of?
On 2022-04-06 at 23:31:46 UTC-0400 (Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:31:46 +0800)
Jeremy Ardley
is rumored to have said:
> I have a mail setup with an internet facing postfix mail server "edge" (LAN
> name "firewall") and in internal LAN postfix with dovecot server "internal".
>
> They both run the same versi
On 7/4/22 3:09 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
your edge sends the original message as an attachment, so your
internal server can not process many of checks. SA option
"report_safe" does this.
You should either trust edge server on its decision, or not do
scanning there. If you do scan the
On 7/4/22 3:09 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
your edge sends the original message as an attachment, so your
internal server can not process many of checks. SA option
"report_safe" does this.
You should either trust edge server on its decision, or not do
scanning there. If you do scan
On 07.04.22 11:31, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
I have a mail setup with an internet facing postfix mail server "edge"
(LAN name "firewall") and in internal LAN postfix with dovecot server
"internal".
They both run the same version of SA with the same rules.
"edge" receives internet mail, scans it wi
