I also want to mirror Bill's comment of a very detailed but report
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, 18:05 Ricky Boone wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, crazy week.
>
> Honestly, I wasn't expecting such a quick and relevant response, so thanks
> and kudos for that. :)
>
> I'm not currently using trunk, so
Sorry for the late reply, crazy week.
Honestly, I wasn't expecting such a quick and relevant response, so thanks
and kudos for that. :)
I'm not currently using trunk, so I will try to patch in the changes
described during a quiet period over the weekend. It does look like that
should do the tri
Bill Cole writes:
> On 2022-03-04 at 09:18:08 UTC-0500 (Fri, 04 Mar 2022 09:18:08 -0500)
> Greg Troxel
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Greg Troxel writes:
>>
>>> With stock scores, sendgrid gets
>>>
>>> 2.1 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
>>>
On 2022-03-04 at 09:18:08 UTC-0500 (Fri, 04 Mar 2022 09:18:08 -0500)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> Greg Troxel writes:
>
>> With stock scores, sendgrid gets
>>
>> 2.1 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
>> [URIs: sendgrid.net]
Hello,
I got reports for multiple spams in form:
From: " martin.redact...@example.com"
To: "ředácted xyz, Ing."
Subject: Fw: xyz.redact...@example.com
(I intentionally kept some chars with diacritics because that was similar to
unredacted addresses looked like)
I was trying to cat
FWIW at least I've found them to be responsive to abuse reports, unlike
Amazon SES.
On 2022-03-04 08:01, Marc wrote:
Is anyone blocking already connections from outbound-mail.sendgrid.net? Does
that generate a lot of false positives?
PS. just posting this so it is on web archives and people se
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 13:01 +, Marc wrote:
> Is anyone blocking already connections from outbound-
> mail.sendgrid.net? Does that generate a lot of false positives?
> PS. just posting this so it is on web archives and people searching
> for sendgrid hopefully chose a better service.
>
Unfort
Greg Troxel writes:
> With stock scores, sendgrid gets
>
> 2.1 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
> [URIs: sendgrid.net]
> 1.5 KAM_SENDGRID Sendgrid being exploited by scammers
>
> and I find 3.6 a bit much. But maybe 72%
CC: trimmed as my message is not an abuse report.
You asked about outright blocking, but you didn't ask if people thought
that was wise.
I received a piece of ham today, and the received line added by my MTA is:
Received: from o1678989x80.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net
(o1678989x80.outbound-mail
On 2022-03-04 14:01, Marc wrote:
Is anyone blocking already connections from
outbound-mail.sendgrid.net? Does that generate a lot of false
positives?
PS. just posting this so it is on web archives and people searching
for sendgrid hopefully chose a better service.
first define better service
10 matches
Mail list logo
