On 2022-01-20 23:35, Bill Cole wrote:
(and probably should) add that machine to your internal_networks
setting, since an RFC1918 address is pretty much the definition of
internal.
another pmc member say to me all rfc1918 is hardcoded in spamassassin
sure if its still missing ?
> On 2022-01-20 at 16:21:40 UTC-0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:21:40 -0500)
> Joe Acquisto-j4
> is rumored to have said:
>
. . . . .
> To figure out what matched, you'll need to check a message with the
> "rules" debug channel on:
>
> spamassassin -t -D rules < suspect.eml
>
> HOWEVER: In looki
>> On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20)
>>
>> old version
>>
>>> * 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available
>>
>> have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ?
>
> Yes, keeping up to date is not my stro
Greg Troxel writes:
> From: Greg Troxel
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:32:53 -0500
>
> I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately
>
> it's in
>
> 3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
>
> and it is
>
> ##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
> header FSL_HELO_NON_F
On 2022-01-20 at 16:21:40 UTC-0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:21:40 -0500)
Joe Acquisto-j4
is rumored to have said:
Am 20.01.22 um 15:47 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks
for? I
noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM.
Star
>>>
> On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20)
>
> old version
>
>> * 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available
>
> have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ?
Yes, keeping up to date is not my strong suit.
> I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately
>
> it's in
>
> 3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
>
> and it is
>
> ##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
> header FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^\]]+
> helo=[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+ /i
> ##} FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
On 2022-01-20 15:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20)
old version
* 1.8 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available
have you configured internal_networks, trusted_networks ?
I followed my own advice about egrep -R and found this immediately
it's in
3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
and it is
##{ FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
header FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^\]]+
helo=[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+ /i
##} FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
with score
score FSL_
>
> Am 20.01.22 um 15:47 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
>> Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I
> noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM.
>>
>> Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local
> settings on postfix, attem
"Joe Acquisto-j4" writes:
> Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I
> noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM.
>
> Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local
> settings on postfix, attempting to isolate a "bug"
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
looks like there's mailer hitting XM_RANDOM
from multiple mails:
X-mailer: Qi Mail Connector 101.21
X-mailer: Qi Mail Connector 103.2
apparently generated by czech company information system:
https://www.qi.cz/system-qi/
Will updat
Where can I get some idea of what the rule below actually checks for? I
noticed some normally passed email was flagged as SPAM.
Started seeing it sometime after making some configuration changes to local
settings on postfix, attempting to isolate a "bug". But before reverting them
all, or
Hello,
looks like there's mailer hitting XM_RANDOM
from multiple mails:
X-mailer: Qi Mail Connector 101.21
X-mailer: Qi Mail Connector 103.2
apparently generated by czech company information system:
https://www.qi.cz/system-qi/
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantom
14 matches
Mail list logo
