On 12/15/21 1:00 PM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
We’d like to say a big “thank you” to all of you who have been testing
the beta version of the Spamhaus Domain Blocklist (DBL) with hostnames.
:-)
You're welcome. Thank you for making it available.
How are you getting on with it? Have you encounte
On 12/15/21 9:39 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
There has recently been a spate of odd spams to harvested
addresses asking hypothetical questions about domains' privacy
practices. It turns out this is a grad student enrolling human
subjects in a study without informed consent... The explanation is
at ht
We’d like to say a big “thank you” to all of you who have been testing
the beta version of the Spamhaus Domain Blocklist (DBL) with hostnames.
How are you getting on with it? Have you encountered issues? Are you
noticing a reduction in false positives with the abused-legit component
of the DBL
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 10:55 -0800, Alan Hodgson wrote:
>
> I got a couple to an actual human who answered
> ab...@princeton.edu. I can forward them privately.
Let me rephrase that; I complained to ab...@princeton.edu and
actually heard back from a human, to whom I have since sent copies of
the sp
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 13:24 -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Does anyone have a sample of one of their emails?
>
> I’m composing a brief nastygram and would like to get my eyes on
> one before finishing up.
>
I got a couple to an actual human who answered ab...@princeton.edu. I
can forward them
You can find the email we received from them here
http://paste.debian.net/1223611/ (just the body, idk if anyone also want
headers)
Must admit I thought it was a scam, just because it was its own domain,
out of the blue and as many have mentioned unsolicited.
Bert
On 15/12/2021 19:24, Charl
Does anyone have a sample of one of their emails?
I’m composing a brief nastygram and would like to get my eyes on one before
finishing up.
Thanks,
Charles
> On Dec 15, 2021, at 11:39 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> There has recently been a spate of odd spams to harvested addresses asking
> hy
You can quote me: If the pope itself is sending me the cure to cancer but
he doesn't have my consent then it IS spam and I would block it and
depending on the way the domain manager handles it I would block the domain.
KAM
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021, 11:40 Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsul
On 12/15/2021 11:39 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
Am I missing something special that makes such research spam somehow
not spam?
Everyone thinks that their own unsolicited bulk email - isn't spam. But
a line must be drawn somewhere. In this case, the sender has absolutely
no preexisting relationship
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 11:39 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> A customer has expressed mild dismay at the concept that a fine
> research institution should be "punished for doing research." I'm
> less attached to Princeton than my NJ-based customer and (having
> worked in a NIH-funded lab) less idolizin
There has recently been a spate of odd spams to harvested addresses asking
hypothetical questions about domains' privacy practices. It turns out this is a
grad student enrolling human subjects in a study without informed consent...
The explanation is at https://measurement.cs.princeton.edu/priva
11 matches
Mail list logo
