On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:08:16PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
> Or http.sh points to an NS that's offline...
Your resolver shoukd time out _way_ sooner than some minutes.
> Can the async lookup be back-ported?
No, and there will be no new 3.4 releases.
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 3:30 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 17:12 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Philip Prindeville writes:
>>>
Ah, the rule _eval_tests_type11_pri0_set1() took 4:20.
>
> On Nov 15, 2021, at 11:12 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:25:55PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 10:35 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 07:49:00PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
What would be helpful here would b
Replies... some duplication of conversation on "mimedefang".
> On Nov 15, 2021, at 10:34 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 2021-11-15 at 18:08:20 UTC-0500 (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:08:20 -0700)
> Philip Prindeville
> is rumored to have said:
>
>>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 8:49 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
On 11/16/2021 7:34 AM, Philipp Ewald wrote:
We support utf-8 Mails and we got Mails utf-8 base64 coded. This should be a reason
too to set spam rating.
Sorry i dont get it. have a nice day.
The point is this:
UTF-8 emails SHOULD be base64 encoded.
ASCII emails SHOULD NOT be base64 encoded
On 11/16/21 00:26, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2021-11-15 at 20:06:22 UTC-0500 (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:06:22 -0500)
Matt Corallo
is rumored to have said:
Full headers follow, but it seems the shopify detection in the above isn't
quite correct;
Return-path:
Envelope-to: vmstfp...@mattcorallo.com
De
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2021-11-15 at 20:06:22 UTC-0500 (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:06:22 -0500)
Matt Corallo
is rumored to have said:
Full headers follow, but it seems the shopify detection in the above isn't
quite correct;
Return-path:
Envelope-to: vmstfp...@mattcorallo.com
D
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, Matt Corallo wrote:
Full headers follow, but it seems the shopify detection in the above isn't
quite correct;
Thanks for the report, will fix.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jh
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Nov 12, 2021, at 8:49 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I got the message, saved it to a flat file, and ran "spamassassin -t -D rules <
netdev.eml" and saw:
...
Nov 12 11:45:38.048 [36367] dbg: rules:
For that matter how many know about 'apropos'? And, even if they do,
they may not discover 'locate' because 'apropos search' doesn't find
either 'updatedb' or 'locate'. You have to enter 'apropos find' to
discover that 'locate' exists, and even then you could get side tracked
into trying to use
On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 08:33 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> Worth noting: locate & updatedb aren't always installed.
>
Fair comment: they're a standard part of Fedora. IIRC they are also part
of the RaspberryPi OS distro, so are likely to be included in Debian and
most of its clones.
But: how many "
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:33:56AM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 at 05:30:25 UTC-0500 (Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:25 +)
> Martin Gregorie
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Of course, other Linux distros may put it somewhere else, so use
> > 'locate' and, if it doesn't find 'txrep', run '
On 2021-11-16 at 05:30:25 UTC-0500 (Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:25 +)
Martin Gregorie
is rumored to have said:
> Of course, other Linux distros may put it somewhere else, so use
> 'locate' and, if it doesn't find 'txrep', run 'sudo updatedb' and try
> again.
>
> Not trying to teach you to suck egg
We support utf-8 Mails and we got Mails utf-8 base64 coded. This should be a
reason too to set spam rating.
Sorry i dont get it. have a nice day.
On 11/16/21 1:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.11.21 um 12:47 schrieb Philipp Ewald:
Why should a uft-8 base64 coded Mail should contain less
heads up!!!
Sorry for the semi off-topic... but just in case this may help...
Encripted zip files witth dangerous ofuscated macros inside calling our beloved
powershell...
Pedro
Why should a uft-8 base64 coded Mail should contain less spam?
When user get compromised we look into Spammails that was sent.
many of that mails was UTF-8 base64 coded and some mail with us-ascii
Guess with mail got through spamassassin?
RIGHT. base64 coded male with charset utf-8. Contain
On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 11:32 +0100, Philipp Ewald wrote:
> This is correct. But why is us-ascii requeired for this rule? Are
> spammer only in US?
>
No, its because the base character set for e-mail bodies is USASCII.
Base64 encoding is a way of making sure that attachments using other
charsets (
My problem is that this rule is useless, while I can set the charset to utf-8
and spamassassin ignores this rule
I got many SPAMS passed through because 1 scorepoint was missing, because charset was set
to "utf-8"
Mail with:
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
getting
On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 17:12 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >
> >
> > Philip Prindeville writes:
> >
> > > Ah, the rule _eval_tests_type11_pri0_set1() took 4:20.
> > >
> > > Why can't I even find the rule?
> >
try "locate txrep"
O
19 matches
Mail list logo
