On 9/22/2021 8:11 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Morning all,
So I'd recommend a different take. Autolearn is an abomination we
never should have published. It is, in effect, a switch to allow a
inherent bias in the modelling to grow and continue.
Agreed, predictable Garbage Out (FP) become
On 21.09.21 13:11, Matt Corallo wrote:
I recently noticed my bayes was rarely matching any spam, and it turns
out this was due to autolearn=ham'ing occurring on lots of list
traffic that I only occasionally read, some of which was blatant spam.
Sadly, list traffic can be pretty hard to categori
On 2021-09-22 14:11, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Morning all,
So I'd recommend a different take. Autolearn is an abomination we
never should have published. It is, in effect, a switch to allow a
inherent bias in the modelling to grow and continue.
Disable autolearn, wipe your Bayes store, and man
Morning all,
So I'd recommend a different take. Autolearn is an abomination we never
should have published. It is, in effect, a switch to allow a inherent bias
in the modelling to grow and continue.
Disable autolearn, wipe your Bayes store, and manually train from hand
classified ham and spam.
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 18:57 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> Well, from the few I've seen, they all seem to have a relatively
> constant structure. Someone pointed you to a plugin that is at least
> dealing in this having a better suggestion.
>
> While I wrote a little Perl a decade ago I've forgot
This is complete news to me! Based on the activity on the dev list, I
had assumed there were still 10-20 people devoting some of their time to
developing SA. If you are the only one, that of course changes my view
very much, and would be something worth communicating in some spot. When
I asked
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:45:43AM +0200, Bert Van de Poel wrote:
>
> I hope I'm not passing on too much of a negative message. It would be great
> of someone had a look at the Bayes autolearn code. I think it would be a
> great service to the community!
The fact is that there really aren't any ac
I think having a look at the code itself is a good idea. I'm not sure if
it's up-to-date but you can find some information on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DevelopmentStuff
I've found that just reporting issues on SA's bugzilla is completely
useless since it's just u
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:57:22PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> I guess one thing you might be able to do is implement a tflags flag of
> absolutely_no_autolearn or some such that would force-disable the autolearn
> decision if the rule had hit, but that might be something that would have to
> be
