On 8/31/2021 12:57 PM, Jared Hall wrote:
2) OTOH, what's the point of sa-update doing versioning if nobody uses it?
It's there to support different rulesets but the project as a whole
found it better to do more complicated things when rules proved
incompatible to encapsulate them in has(cap
Here's a spample snippet from a Google user-forwarded Email to their
account here:
subject: ***SPAM*** welcome ixzS
CC:
List-ID: <6417211.xt.local>
In-Reply-To:
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:23:19 +0200
Sender: jeff-w4wsfqjn...@bentenpreg.co.uk
To:
From: "ProvideInsurance"
The body content mak
Rick Cooper wrote:
It would appear you are using the SA git trunk version of the plugin
(Andrew Colin Kissa informed me of the existence) which changes a LOT
of the api.
Near as I can tell the old module will work with your rules by adding
the following at about line 489 of the DecodeShortURLs.
It would appear you are using the SA git trunk version of the plugin (Andrew
Colin Kissa informed me of the existence) which changes a LOT of the api.
Near as I can tell the old module will work with your rules by adding the
following at about line 489 of the DecodeShortURLs.pm module. Seems like t
Hi
There is a new DecodeShortURLs in Spamassassin trunk, the API has changed
from the one in the original module on GitHub.
The new builtin module has the short_url function but the original module uses
short_url_tests, the original module does not have a short_url function thus
the error generat
