On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 16:32 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> Sending spam, viruses, ransom demands, and/or spearfishing from
> "known" addresses is extremely common, so how effective that is
> depends a lot on the sort of mail and the amount of mail you receive.
>
Agreed, but I'm not silly enough to have t
On 01 Jul 2021, at 16:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 02.07.21 um 00:32 schrieb @lbutlr:
>>> I also manually maintain a private blacklist, which contains the 'From'
>>> addresses of advertising e-mails from companies that I've dealt with in
>>> the past. This works because many (most?) companies use
Hi,
> >> I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
> > What legitimate email uses javascript?
> And more important: which email clients do actually process Javascript
> that comes within an email? Thunderbird doesn't since 10 or 20 years
> ago. I don't know of any other as well. This ph
On 29 Jun 2021, at 04:50, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 00:52 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>> On 2021-06-28 at 17:04:05 UTC-0400 (Mon, 28 Jun 2021 23:04:05 +0200)
>> Robert Harnischmacher
>> is rumored to have said:
>>> In which form can one submit the subdomain of a mail sender for
I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
What legitimate email uses javascript?
And more important: which email clients do actually process Javascript
that comes within an email? Thunderbird doesn't since 10 or 20 years
ago. I don't know of any other as well. This phish is probab
On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 18:40:04 +0100
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 18:59 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On 2021-07-01 17:03, RW wrote:
> >
> > > > I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
> > > What legitimate email uses javascript?
> >
> > and what mua will sh
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 18:59 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-07-01 17:03, RW wrote:
>
> > > I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
> > What legitimate email uses javascript?
>
> and what mua will show html attachment as default ?
Evolution is as configurable as any MUA I've u
On 2021-06-30 21:51, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone like to help me block this office phish? It includes an
HTML file that presents an O365 login page:
https://pastebin.com/JMSrY6KU
More javascript in an HTML file.
# put this content into a file name "local_html.cdb" in clamav database
dir
Sa
On 2021-07-01 17:42, Henrik K wrote:
John's already done something that hits:
mimeheader T_OBFU_HTML_ATTACHContent-Type =~
m,\bapplication/octet-stream\b.+\.html?\b,i
Maybe that along with checking for very short body etc.
add htmltidy to extract text plugin would also solve it, perl t
On 2021-07-01 17:03, RW wrote:
I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
What legitimate email uses javascript?
and what mua will show html attachment as default ?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 08:42:01AM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I modified the ExtractText plugin to also process HTML files
> > >
> > > extracttext_externalhtmlcat /usr/bin/cat {}
> > > extracttext_use htmlcat .htm .html
> > >
> >
> > Quite horrible hack, as the result should be
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:42:01 -0400
Alex wrote:
> I realize blocking all javascript is prone to error,
What legitimate email uses javascript?
On 30.06.21 23:05, Bert Van de Poel wrote:
SpamAssassin has plugins for PhishTank and OpenPhish. I would suggest
you submit the link to them.
You can also reach out to the domain provider, hosting provider(s) and
other companies involved.
don't you mean clamav instead?
On 30/06/2021 21:51, A
Hi,
> > I modified the ExtractText plugin to also process HTML files
> >
> > extracttext_externalhtmlcat /usr/bin/cat {}
> > extracttext_use htmlcat .htm .html
> >
>
> Quite horrible hack, as the result should be _rendered_ text. Inserting raw
> HTML for all body rules is probably b
14 matches
Mail list logo
