On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, @lbutlr wrote:
On 27 Apr 2021, at 11:57, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-27 01:19 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
Invalid List-ID. You can then use that with other weirdness in a meta.
header__LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS List-id =~ /<([\w-]+)(\.[\w-]+)+>/
meta LIST_ID_IMPROPE
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
My guess is if you contact the admin of hostkarma directly and offer to host
a honeypot he might take you up on it. But that still won't give you the
ability to change anything in the database.
I cannot imagine trusting a RBL that allowed any huma
On 27 Apr 2021, at 11:57, Steve Dondley wrote:
> On 2021-04-27 01:19 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
>> Invalid List-ID. You can then use that with other weirdness in a meta.
>> header__LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS List-id =~ /<([\w-]+)(\.[\w-]+)+>/
>> meta LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORMAT __HAS_LIST_ID && !__L
My guess is if you contact the admin of hostkarma directly and offer to
host a honeypot he might take you up on it. But that still won't give
you the ability to change anything in the database.
I cannot imagine trusting a RBL that allowed any humans to blacklist
something. Whitelisting is dif
I have generally been a fan of the HOSTKARMA DNSBL over the long term.
Fuzzy memeory is that the operator was responsive and reaasonable.
Long ago (2014) I complained somewhat generally about spamassassin's
DNSBL inclusion policy, and was (quite reasonably) asked for specifics.
This report is te
On 2021-04-27 03:03 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
Invalid List-ID. You can then use that with other weirdness in a
meta.
header __LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS List-id =~
/<([\w-]+)(\.[\w-]+)+>/
meta LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORMAT __HAS_LIST_ID &&
!__LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS
score LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORM
Invalid List-ID. You can then use that with other weirdness in a meta.
header __LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS List-id =~
/<([\w-]+)(\.[\w-]+)+>/
meta LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORMAT __HAS_LIST_ID &&
!__LIST_ID_DOMAIN_IN_BRACKETS
score LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORMAT 0.001
describe LIST_ID_IMPROPER_FORMAT
Hi,
Investigate adding the SEM_FRESH rules - this domain was created less
than five days ago.
https://spameatingmonkey.com/services
OK, how do I get those rules installed? I've only installed KAM rules
using a channel. I don't see anything similar for SEM rules. I see the
page you linked to
On 2021-04-27 02:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.04.21 um 19:57 schrieb Steve Dondley:
On 2021-04-27 01:19 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
Investigate adding the SEM_FRESH rules - this domain was created less
than five days ago.
https://spameatingmonkey.com/services
OK, how do I get those rules inst
On 2021-04-27 01:19 PM, Dave Wreski wrote:
-2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
[185.41.28.7 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
We've reduced this score to -1 locally.
-1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 t
Steve Dondley writes:
> On 2021-04-27 01:12 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> As always, if you have a problem stemming from a dns-based or similar
>> reputation list, you need to report problems to those lists.
>>
>> If you aren't running greylisting with aggressive delays for SBL/XBL
>> and
>> moderat
On 21 Apr 2021, at 11:45, Kris Deugau wrote:
Can anyone point me to a reference document describing what the
"data-saferedirecturl" attribute on an tag is supposed to be
useful for, and for bonus points any hints why it can't be trivially
and horribly abused by scammers?
Most of the search
On 2021-04-27 01:12 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
As always, if you have a problem stemming from a dns-based or similar
reputation list, you need to report problems to those lists.
If you aren't running greylisting with aggressive delays for SBL/XBL
and
moderate for dialup, do that too.
What does "
-2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
[185.41.28.7 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
We've reduced this score to -1 locally.
-1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
Needs to be trained, obviously. Ba
On 2021-04-27 18:51, Steve Dondley wrote:
Got this: https://pastebin.com/Gfz951dh
Spam report:
Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA
As always, if you have a problem stemming from a dns-based or similar
reputation list, you need to report problems to those lists.
If you aren't running greylisting with aggressive delays for SBL/XBL and
moderate for dialup, do that too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Got this: https://pastebin.com/Gfz951dh
Spam report:
Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
17 matches
Mail list logo
