On 2021-04-25 19:31, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Apr 2021, at 18:40, Alan wrote:
We run cPanel servers and scan every outbound message with SA in
order to reduce the amount of garbage that comes through website
contact forms.
That's good.
However, in a default cPanel configuration, HAS_X_OUTGOI
On 25 Apr 2021, at 18:40, Alan wrote:
We run cPanel servers and scan every outbound message with SA in order
to reduce the amount of garbage that comes through website contact
forms.
That's good.
However, in a default cPanel configuration, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT
scores a whopping 2.3. I'm
We run cPanel servers and scan every outbound message with SA in order
to reduce the amount of garbage that comes through website contact forms.
However, in a default cPanel configuration, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT
scores a whopping 2.3. I'm not sure what the distribution default is but
that's
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:34:16 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
> I’m experimenting with writing my own rules. My machines are using SA
> 3.4.4 so I want to use the 3.4.4 rules.
There is only one set of rules, "if" statements handle any differences.
RW writes:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:48:06 -0400
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> I recently went thrugh my setup and read a bunch of web pages, and
>> decided to try TXREP.My summary comments after a few weeks:
>>
>> It seems to be working quite well.
>>
>> Outbound processing is really usefu
On 2021-04-25 01:47 PM, Henrik K wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:28:31PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> mass-check -c parameter expects to find every config file in that single
> directory. Now it's missing spamassassin updates and specifically
> 20_aux_tlds.cf from there. You could copy it
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:48:06 -0400
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I recently went thrugh my setup and read a bunch of web pages, and
> decided to try TXREP.My summary comments after a few weeks:
>
> It seems to be working quite well.
>
> Outbound processing is really useful; people I mail to get n
spamassassin -V reports: "SpamAssassin version 3.4.4"
I imagine I have to checkout an older 3.4.4 point version from SVN and
use the mass-check command from that. It's been ages since I've used
SVN.
How can I get to the older version via SVN?
I solved this by downloading version 3.4.4 of S
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 01:28:31PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
>
> > mass-check -c parameter expects to find every config file in that single
> > directory. Now it's missing spamassassin updates and specifically
> > 20_aux_tlds.cf from there. You could copy it to /etc/spamassassin
> > temporaril
On 4/25/21 7:34 PM, Steve Dondley wrote:
On Apr 25, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Axb wrote:
What are you trying to do?
run masscheck for your rules or for the SA project?
I’m experimenting with writing my own rules. My machines are using SA 3.4.4 so
I want to use the 3.4.4 rules.
this may give yo
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Axb wrote:
>
> What are you trying to do?
> run masscheck for your rules or for the SA project?
I’m experimenting with writing my own rules. My machines are using SA 3.4.4 so
I want to use the 3.4.4 rules.
What are you trying to do?
run masscheck for your rules or for the SA project?
On 4/25/21 7:28 PM, Steve Dondley wrote:
mass-check -c parameter expects to find every config file in that single
directory. Now it's missing spamassassin updates and specifically
20_aux_tlds.cf from there. You co
mass-check -c parameter expects to find every config file in that
single
directory. Now it's missing spamassassin updates and specifically
20_aux_tlds.cf from there. You could copy it to /etc/spamassassin
temporarily, but I'd rather make a completely separate directory that
should
include
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 07:38:44PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 12:17:51PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> > I'm running this command:
> >
> > ./mass-check -n --rules='^LOCAL_AWK_INTRO' -o ham:dir:/spam/Maildir/.INBOX*
> > -c=/etc/spamassassin/ | grep '. 1'
> >
> >
> > Everyth
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 12:17:51PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> I'm running this command:
>
> ./mass-check -n --rules='^LOCAL_AWK_INTRO' -o ham:dir:/spam/Maildir/.INBOX*
> -c=/etc/spamassassin/ | grep '. 1'
>
>
> Everything appears to work as expected but I'm getting this warning/error
> when
I'm running this command:
./mass-check -n --rules='^LOCAL_AWK_INTRO' -o
ham:dir:/spam/Maildir/.INBOX* -c=/etc/spamassassin/ | grep '. 1'
Everything appears to work as expected but I'm getting this
warning/error when I do:
"config: registryboundaries: no tlds defined, need to run sa-updat
I noticed that there is a languages file in
/usr/local/share/spamassassin/ (DEF_RULES_DIR) installed by the SA
package as well as a newer and larger version installed by sa-update.
When I look at the debug it looks like the wrong one is being used:
textcat: loading languages file /usr/local/
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 04:55:43PM +0100, RW wrote:
>
> I noticed that there is a languages file in
> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/ (DEF_RULES_DIR) installed by the SA
> package as well as a newer and larger version installed by sa-update.
>
> When I look at the debug it looks like the wrong
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-25 01:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
That rule has this line in the 72_active.cf file:
Look in 72_scores.cf and compare the modification dates on that file.
I recently went thrugh my setup and read a bunch of web pages, and
decided to try TXREP.My summary comments after a few weeks:
It seems to be working quite well.
Outbound processing is really useful; people I mail to get negative
points on inbound messages.
I worry less about FPs fr
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-25 01:00 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
That rule has this line in the 72_active.cf file:
Look in 72_scores.cf and compare the modification dates on that file.
The date is Jan 30, 2020. I'm running SA 3
On 2021-04-25 10:19 AM, RW wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:40:59 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
On both machines, /usr/share/spasmassassin/72_active.cf has this rule
which is commented out:
This is the legacy rule directory from before sa-update existed.
Have you not got another directory popu
On 2021-04-25 05:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.04.21 um 07:09 schrieb Steve Dondley:
That rule has this line in the 72_active.cf file:
Look in 72_scores.cf and compare the modification dates on that file.
Their scores as of today (saturday):
72_scores.cf:score FSL_BULK_SIG
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:40:59 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
>
> On both machines, /usr/share/spasmassassin/72_active.cf has this rule
> which is commented out:
>
This is the legacy rule directory from before sa-update existed.
Have you not got another directory populated by sa-update?
Completely agree with Joe. Normally if we did that we saw some situation
where they were using something other than a space perhaps a pipe or a plus
or a non-printable character or something else. So we made the rest of the
role like that to future proof it against other variants of the same spam.
On 4/23/21 2:52 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
I'm looking at KAM.cf. There is this rule:
body __KAM_WEB2 /INDIA based
IT|indian.based.website|certified.it.company/i
I'm wondering if there is a good reason why a singe period is used
instead of somethi
26 matches
Mail list logo
