I could add another point between BAYES_999 and BAYES_99 scores but that
seems reactionary. Is there a better way? Should I thrown in another point
for certain keywords in marketing emails like these?
For this specific message I might be inclined to add a rule to check for a
URL in the subject
On 2021-04-22 23:54, Steve Dondley wrote:
Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to
100%
On 2021-04-22 02:31 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.04.21 14:21, Steve Dondley wrote:
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
https://www.dnswl.org/,
David B Funk wrote:
How hard would it be to modify the uribl lookup code so that it did not
truncate hosts names, so we could create uribl entries of the form
"name-company-track.appspot.com" or would that be prohibitively
expensive in lookups?
util_rb_2tld
For appspot.com specifically, ac
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.04.21 14:21, Steve Dondley wrote:
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
On 22.04.21 14:21, Steve Dondley wrote:
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
https://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust
For whatever reason, solicitations from marketers for various web
development services are easily slipping through my defenses. I figured
bayes filtering would eventually do the job but after a reporting them
for many days now, I'm still getting like 3 to half dozen a day. Here's
one example: h
The DCC FAQ at https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/FAQ.html#license
describes the definitive ways to get any questions answered regarding
DCC licensing. Any answers you could get here would be conjecture and
anecdote.
I found a form on their website for licensing questions. Waiting to hear
back.
On 22 Apr 2021, at 9:20, Steve Dondley wrote:
Sorry if this is a bit off-topic.
More than a bit.
DCC is not owned, released, or bundled by the ASF SpamAssassin Project
or any other part of the ASF. The SpamAssassin project doesn't have any
control over DCC licensing or any particular expert
On 22.04.21 09:20, Steve Dondley wrote:
Sorry if this is a bit off-topic.
I'm looking into installing DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearninghouse)
software.
DCC has it's own users list.
I don't see anything in there about disallowing usage of the software
by "managed mail services."
there's
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex: Gentoo)
or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried to remove it and install it again ?
Best regards,
Iulian Stan
On 202
On 2021-04-22 14:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
still, authenticated mail is outgoing mail, not incoming mail, and you
should not expect it to be DKIM-signed, you have to dkim-sign it.
dont dkim sign if mails is not localy smtp auth senders / clients
forwarding mail servers should only ARC
Sorry if this is a bit off-topic.
I'm looking into installing DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearninghouse)
software.
The page at https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/INSTALL.html says:
"The free license is intended to cover individuals and organizations
including Internet service providers using DCC
On 21.04.21 00:11, RW wrote:
>Anything that enters through through the remote trusted network and
>hits ALL_TRUSTED will almost certainly pass whatever authentication
>mechanism are set-up for the domain.
>
>The difference between ALL_TRUSTED and ALL_INTERNAL will likely be
>small. There are minor
pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7
On 4/22/2021 7:29 AM, iulian stan wrote:
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex:
Gentoo) or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried
Thanks for all the replies.
1) I've removed
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
from local.cf (The issue occurred even if commented anyway).
2) I do have
v310.pre:# Pyzor - perform Pyzor message checks.
v310.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor (Which, I think, is where
the err
Don Saklad wrote on 20/04/21 3:36 am:
How do you set nomail for the List?
I can't tell if any of the replies to your query actually answered your
question because of the various interpretations of "nomail" and the way
the thread expanded into a discussion of other mailing list policies.
If
17 matches
Mail list logo
