> On 21.04.21 00:11, RW wrote:
> >Anything that enters through through the remote trusted network and
> >hits ALL_TRUSTED will almost certainly pass whatever authentication
> >mechanism are set-up for the domain.
> >
> >The difference between ALL_TRUSTED and ALL_INTERNAL will likely be
> >small.
Michael Grant wrote:
> > > After all, if just anyone, without subscription, can post to a list, then
> > > it's
> > > open to the entire Internet, and then, as we all know, anarchy ensues...
>
> The Debian mailing lists too are open for anyone to post regardless if
> they are subscribed.
Sorry
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2021, at 18:29, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Hmm... No. I disagree. It's not if-one-then-the-other. All that is
> > needed to disprove it is one example. And as it happens I can list
> > two immediately.
>
> Which does nothing to disprove "most mailing list require subscr
>> Hello
>>
>> Asking for litle help.. Doevecot and sieve are running fine.. One
>> thing now, if receiving mail from Users-spamassassin
>>
>> This mail will by forwarding from sieve to folder spam. I didn't see
>> why this will transfer there.
>You have two conflicting X-Spam-flag headers
Eric Broch writes:
> From: Eric Broch
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:28 -0600
>
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
> in response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> #pyzor
> use_pyzor 1
> pyzor_pat
Can anyone point me to a reference document describing what the
"data-saferedirecturl" attribute on an tag is supposed to be useful
for, and for bonus points any hints why it can't be trivially and
horribly abused by scammers?
Most of the search results I've turned up reference URL-munging ob
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:00:28AM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in
> response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> #pyzor
> use_pyzor 1
> pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
>
> Perusing the i
On 21/04/2021 16:15, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don't
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don't have this in my config at all. Maybe you are
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
Perusing the internet it seems this has been around for a while. Is
there a simple fix?
> After all, if just anyone, without subscription, can post to a list, then it's
> open to the entire Internet, and then, as we all know, anarchy ensues...
But, but, but... SpamAssassin's entire purpose is an anti-spam
function! Oh the irony of it!
On 21.04.21 06:41, Michael Grant wrote:
T
> But, but, but... SpamAssassin's entire purpose is an anti-spam
> function! Oh the irony of it!
>
> > After all, if just anyone, without subscription, can post to a list, then
> > it's
> > open to the entire Internet, and then, as we all know, anarchy ensues...
The Debian mailing lists too a
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:40:58 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
I suggested exempting messages hitting ALL_TRUSTED from
KAM_DMARC_REJECT.
Matus noted correctly that doing so with external machines in
trusted_networks could result in "problems" i.e. allowing unsigned
(i.e. fake) messages to bypass KAM_DMARC_R
13 matches
Mail list logo
