On 4/9/2021 8:26 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
That sounds reasonable. But my experience is that spamhaus RBLs (zen,
zrd, dbl) have a zero false positive rate (or so low that I have never
found one). IMHO if an email is matched by spamhaus it is the sender's
big problem, not the recipient's. (An
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:10:02 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> pyzor was originally razor rewritten in python, but now uses own
> servers, with the same intention AFAIK.
It's not just a matter of servers they do very different things. Pyzor
hashes selected lines from a preprocessed version
my point is valid as writed, remote pyzor servers dont know what is spam or not
localy, but it
could share results if wanted, but this was never implemented into pyzord or
pyzor client
On Sun, April 11, 2021 17:44, Antony Stone wrote:
I must be confused then - what do you believe *is* the pu
On 13.04.21 10:03, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
Examples: https://pastebin.com/pF6Nmquc
bots IP 63.80.189.31 and 63.80.189.6 are in multiple blacklists, SORBS included.
I guess standard combination of BAYES, DNSBLs, fuxxy checksums would block
that.
but, yes, it seems as spam source.
UCEPROTECTL
Examples: https://pastebin.com/pF6Nmquc
Well, I can see a couple of simple rules that would catch these two, but I
don't know if they would also trip on legit mail.
List-Unsubscribe: m'http://180e977\.olink1\.xyz'
X-Mailer-SID: m'\b180e977_18\b'
Examples: https://pastebin.com/pF6Nmquc
--
Med vänlig hälsning
Anders Gustafsson, ingenjör
anders.gustafs...@pedago.fi | Support +358 18 12060 | Direkt +358 9 315 45
121 | Mobil +358 40506 7099
Pedago interaktiv ab, Nygatan 7 B , AX-22100 MARIEHAMN, ÅLAND, FINLAND
>>> Matus UHLAR - fa
