Re: Problem with local.cf rules

On 2021-03-17 03:58, Peter West wrote: Seconded. The keywords here are "local, caching, *NON-FORWARDING* DNS server for SpamAssassin". URIBL_BLOCKED is not data from sorbs in bind9 its needed to add qname-minimization disabled; into options section if this is not added it breaks uribl and

URIBL_BLOCKED (was: Re: Problem with local.cf rules)

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Peter West wrote: The most pertinent stuff I found was this this Confluence page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/CachingNameserver So it looks as though I have to install a primary nameserver and a secondary rbldnsd. I’m trying to translate this

Re: Problem with local.cf rules

The most pertinent stuff I found was this this Confluence page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/CachingNameserver So it looks as though I have to install a primary nameserver and a secondary rbl

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:33:58 -0400 Steve Dondley wrote: > You covered a lot of ground here. Thanks.. If you have some spare > cycles, I have follow up questions to get an understanding of how you > process your email: > I presume this is a reply to Harold, in which case I would take it with a

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

You covered a lot of ground here. Thanks.. If you have some spare cycles, I have follow up questions to get an understanding of how you process your email: 21 seconds at that includes fetch the samples via imap from two folders, fire them against a bayes-only spamassasin instance, What is a

Re: Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:16:49 -0400 Steve Dondley wrote: > I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into > different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw > it into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the > whole pile. > > It dawne

Workflow for adding new ham/spam to existing site-wide database?

I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw it into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the whole pile. It dawned on me that this will get very slow as I eventually collect tens

Re: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

--On Sunday, March 14, 2021 1:23 PM +1000 Simon Wilson wrote: You've not stated your OS but on a RHEL/CentOS 7 box the correct way to remove is to go to /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d and delete sought.conf. RHEL bugzilla for the issue: