Re: Spamssassin seems to append .com TLD to uri link domains found

Tobi, can you open a bug about this and add a spample of the issue? ch is in the TLD list 20_aux_tlds.cf. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:56 AM Tobi wro

Re: Certain rules with zero value

Those can be ignored. They are by design. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:26 AM Dean Carpenter < deano-spamassas...@areyes.com> wrote: > On 2020-11-18

Re: txrep - why it inserts some strange values to db?

TxRep could have some bugs but I've not found it to cause a FP in years so it's generally safe for production use. Do you have an email that might replicate the issue? -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcg

Re: Rule tag for _USERNAME_?

Hi Dan, Milters are the glue that change the email. SpamAssassin is just giving data back to the milter. I believe you will find that X-Spam-Status header is being built by spamass-milter not by spamassasin. You need to change the milter code to keep track of the user and add it to the X-Spam-S

Re: How do I determine if user's email is being checked against the side-wide database?

On 2021-03-13 21:08, RW wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but insufficiently trained... It doesn't. it could be added so when its not trained show its needs more data meta BAYES_NOT_TRAINED (!BAYE

Re: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org

- Message from a...@onet.eu - Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:16:25 +0100 From: a...@onet.eu Subject: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Hi, I'm getting this from cron since two days: channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org'

Re: How do I determine if user's email is being checked against the side-wide database?

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but > insufficiently trained... It doesn't.

Re: How do I determine if user's email is being checked against the side-wide database?

Are there any BAYES hits on their messages, ham or spam? BAYES_{not 50} would be a positive confirmation. I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but insufficiently trained... In one email, I'm seeing this: 3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to

Re: How do I determine if user's email is being checked against the side-wide database?

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Steve Dondley wrote: I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all users on a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include "bayes_path" and "bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about permissions being wrong from debian-spamd in m

How do I determine if user's email is being checked against the side-wide database?

I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all users on a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include "bayes_path" and "bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about permissions being wrong from debian-spamd in mail.log. But rather than guessing, I'm won