On 15 Jan 2021, at 17:51, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
All,
In doing a sort of my mailbox, I'm finding that there are many popular
spams with to: undisclosed-recipients. Which is *legal* but, in some
cases shouldn't exist.
In our particular use case, the box we're looking to protect is the
All,
In doing a sort of my mailbox, I'm finding that there are many popular
spams with to: undisclosed-recipients. Which is *legal* but, in some
cases shouldn't exist.
In our particular use case, the box we're looking to protect is the
dayjob's info@ box. Nobody should be bccing the thing.
All,
For dumb reasons, we at the day job are using spamass-milter, which
doesn't seem to let SpamAssassin add any extra X-Spam-Foo: message tags
beyond stock (I have a github issue open on this, which seems to be
where a fork is being maintained).
However, in order to work around this, I've
Maybe a tflag on the AskDNS to mark it as an RBL lookup? This doesn't exist
currently
Adjusting to "dns_query_restriction deny fmb.la" will avoid just this
domain lookups
Paul
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 13:09, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:43:42 +0100
> Dan Malm wrote:
>
> > I've just noticed
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:43:42 +0100
Dan Malm wrote:
> I've just noticed that spamassassin queries
> .fresh.fmb.la despite me having set "skip_rbl_checks 1"
> ...
> Am I missing something?
That list is queried via AskDNS.
Hi,
I've just noticed that spamassassin queries .fresh.fmb.la
despite me having set "skip_rbl_checks 1" in my local.cf
The only way I seem to be able to stop it from being queried is to set
"dns_query_restriction deny la"
This happens both on FreeBSD 12.2
SpamAssassin version 3.4.4
running on P
