On 2020/10/18 09:22, L A Walsh wrote:
On 2020/10/17 15:58, RW wrote:
Probably a networking problem at the time sa-update ran.
status: 1792 decodes to a curl error code of 7 "Failed to connect to
host".
I suspect it's a bug that 1792 wasn't decoded.
Reinstalled from CPAN...getting same
On 10/24/20 7:52 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
Needless to say, the producers of spam and other malware are getting
more and more clever.
Amazon is obviously one of the largest targets. I received the e-mail
at the bottom, obviously fraudulent. Normally I mark those and remove
them. In this ca
This is what I did, it works a 100% :).
outlook.com REJECT Too much spam from outlook.com, please use another email
service.
Juerg
> -Original Message-
> From: John
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 9:31 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: What can one do abut outlook.
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John skrev den 2020-10-24 21:30:
A regular source of spam is outlook.com;
is spamassassin say is not spam ?
in that case:
blacklist_from *@outlook.com
...and then whitelist specific desireable-correspondent outlook.com
addresses.
--
John Hard
John skrev den 2020-10-24 21:30:
A regular source of spam is outlook.com;
is spamassassin say is not spam ?
in that case:
blacklist_from *@outlook.com
if it contains urls, is this urls unlisted ?
i see low scooring spams aswell, and i add it to local rules to stop it
A regular source of spam is outlook.com; or at least that is the
domain that delivered the junk to my domain. I am tempted to block
them but a number of universities with whom I have connections seem to
have outsourced mailing to outlook. I complain regularly (daily) but
all I ever see as a resul
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:51:14 -0500
Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> ... I have found
> two important items. One relates to sendmail...
>
> (1) My first line of defense is the access.db sendmail file. It turns
> out that the only header that is actually inspected is the top line,
> which begins with "F
Discovery (1), which is sendmail related, has already been posted.
(2) Spamassassin issue:
I submitted two sets of spam messages to closer inspection. In the
first, spamassassin behaves as expected. In the "stealth" one, things do
not seem to be behaving as they should.
Each of the messages
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:43:25 +0200
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Is my setup of txrep bad or is "normal"?
> > Thanks
> >
> txrep add positive/negative score based on the reputation of the
> sender, if this sender normally send ham email it is normal that a
> negative score will be applied. If spam
