Re: no rules found: failures in accessing all online sources

2020-10-17 Thread RW
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:55:54 -0700 L A Walsh wrote: > Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: -1 -> 895075 > http: (curl) GET http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/895075.tar.gz, > FAILED, status: 1792 > http: (curl) GET http://sa-update.spamassassin.org/895075.tar.gz, > FAILED, statu

Re: no rules found: failures in accessing all online sources

2020-10-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
What does running curl on the same box for http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/895075.tar.gz get you? On Sat, Oct 17, 2020, 17:56 L A Walsh wrote: > Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: -1 -> 895075 > http: (curl) GET http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/895075.tar.gz, > FAILED, status:

no rules found: failures in accessing all online sources

2020-10-17 Thread L A Walsh
Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org: -1 -> 895075 http: (curl) GET http://sa-update.verein-clean.net/895075.tar.gz, FAILED, status: 1792 http: (curl) GET http://sa-update.spamassassin.org/895075.tar.gz, FAILED, status: 1792 http: (curl) GET http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/895075.

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread jdow
On 20201017 10:58:13, RW wrote: On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400 Bill Cole wrote: On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote: perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 and versions <4 should have the original rules. The rule name change is an artifact of h

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:18:16 -0400 Bill Cole wrote: > On 16 Oct 2020, at 21:06, Noel Butler wrote: > > > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 > > and versions <4 should have the original rules. > > The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are > version-c

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
That sums it up well for now, yes.  4.0 will even let you still use the same config options so there is a timeline for planning for the removal of the options with 4.1 whenever that is. On 10/17/2020 11:10 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Thanks a lot to all who replied. So, for the uninitiated like me

Re: the pending whitelist* -> welcomelist* change

2020-10-17 Thread Victor Sudakov
Bill Cole wrote: > > > perhaps, the rules above should be defined only for version >=4 > > and versions <4 should have the original rules. > > The rule name change is an artifact of how the rules are version-controlled. > We have exactly one version of the rules and it resides in the trunk of the